User talk:Melonflame37

January 2014

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Macintosh with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 23:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wilfrid Laurier University, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Wilfrid Laurier University was changed by Melonflame37 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970107 on 2014-01-16T23:50:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Melonflame37 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for vandalizing. I promise not to do so anymore after I am unblocked, and will only make productive edits. For example, I am a huge sports fan, and would like to contribute to that area. I am sorry for the disruption I've caused and would like to apologize to discospinster for the personal attack. Also I didn't get the final warning message that says something like "This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize, you will be blocked" prior to my block Melonflame37 (talk) 23:56, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 01:30, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is your last warning.Your recent test edits to Copyright infringement were not constructive. It was vandalism and was reverted. Entry of false information is not helpful. If you want to experiment or make a test edit, please use the sandbox. These pages are patrolled by robots and human editors like me. When you make an edit please leave an accurate edit summary, and not a misleading one. You can be blocked for this. Further vandalism will get you blocked from editing without further notice. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:06, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Melonflame37 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just cause I'm a sock doesn't mean I can't change and begin making productive edits now, I plan on doing so. My original account's talk is blocked from editing so I can't make a request there. You can unblock my main instead of this

Decline reason:

you are a checkuser-confirmed sockpuppet of a user who is banned from Wikipedia and, as such, you will not be unblocked.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:51, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.