User talk:Michaelmross

Welcome!

Hello, Michaelmross, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 18:07, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Communication

Communication needs to go both ways. You complain that someone "flamed" you, but others could with equal (or better) justification say that you "flamed" them in what you wrote at talk:Riemann zeta function. I was simply attempting to understand what your concern is. It doesn't seem polite for you to complain bitterly about others misunderstanding you and then walk away, when others are attempting to understand and you're no longer willing to understand or to help others understand.

You say there is general information about values of zeta at integers, and then it goes on to specific information about values of zeta at complex numbers. But integers are more specific than complex numbers, and complex numbers more general than integers. Michael Hardy 02:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

natural number series might belong in a *topic about zeta functions in general*.

Another problem: the values given in that section are only those of the Riemann zeta function, not those of any other zeta functions. So they certainly don't belong in an article about zeta functions in general. Michael Hardy 17:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

modular arithmetic

You wrote:

The clock dial is the basis and the origin of modular arithmetic.

I find that wildly implausible. What reason do you have to say such a thing? Can you cite any source? Michael Hardy 17:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:FrancisLucille.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:FrancisLucille.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:31, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Jean Klein.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jean Klein.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francis Lucille (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Alalch E. was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references are all either non-indenpendent, non-reliable, and/or don't contain significant coverage of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Francis Lucille and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Alalch E. 00:18, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Michaelmross! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —Alalch E. 00:18, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]