User talk:MissKriss

This is MissKriss's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

A tag has been placed on Randy gill, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking 01:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BBRBR

I reviewed the content of your article which I deleted. I still don't think it is suitable for inclusion in our encyclopedia. I suggest reading our guideline on notability to see why I made this judgement. One possibility would be to userfy the information, which means it would be placed on a subpage of your user space. Let me know if you need any help in doing this and I will be pleased to help. Finally I'm sorry I had to delete your contribution. --Guinnog 14:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Radio

See WP:RADIO for information about editing articles relating to radio. --Teratornis 18:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Perhaps the biggest challenge for new editors on Wikipedia is understanding that we don't just write what we know, we write what we can verify by citing reliable sources. In everyday life, people learn things through experience, word-of-mouth, or by reading about them. We remember things, but often we forget exactly how we learned them. Most people do not remain consciously aware of how they know what they know. They remember the "what," and forget the "how." Writing on Wikipedia requires an extra level of discipline; we don't write anything and everything we know, but only what we can find reliable sources for. Therefore, the best approach to writing for Wikipedia is to start with some reliable sources, and write articles about what they contain. The vast majority of new editors take the opposite approach: they get an idea to write about something they know, and only later do they discover the need to find reliable sources for what they know. --Teratornis 18:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:BBRBR.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:BBRBR.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ricardocampana.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ricardocampana.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ricardocampana.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ricardocampana.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]