User talk:Mjs2010

One Tree Hill

Can you stop putting "US DVD Cover" please. It's not just for the U.S., my UK DVD is the same artwork. Please click "view history" on the page to see why your edits have been reverted. Jayy008 (talk) 00:14, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

If you read the message I put up on the info for season 1, the DVD Cover for Australia is different

You don't put it that way. Just put "US and UK DVD cover" it's more specific and looks less messy. Also when posting on someone's page put for of these: ~ to sign your posts so we know it's you. Jayy008 (talk) 00:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

ok soz, im new here, taking time getting used to all the functions

I know how that feels. Anything you need to know about functions, templates or formatting, just ask. Jayy008 (talk) 00:27, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Cool thanks, sorry to annoy you with the cover captions.

It's fine. I'm really happy to help, once you get into it and know of the rules and everything, you'll be fine. I can see already you're going to be a great help on the One Tree Hill articles :). PS. Remember to sign your posts even on your page everytime you right something that's directed at someone use the four bendy lines (~) <<<I used one there so it doesn't sign mine there but you get the jist. Jayy008 (talk) 00:42, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

ok, yeah I love One Tree Hill Mjs2010 (talk) 00:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Me too! Jayy008 (talk) 21:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

I tried, but it wasn't working. Then I realised it was the old poster, I know they're using the same poster, but it needs to actually say "Tuesday's 8/7c" the one you uploaded still says "Monday 8/7c" If you find one that is new I'll upload it for you and sort the sizing out :) Jayy008 (talk) 18:01, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

List of One Tree Hill characters

Hello again :). Just to let you know I've reverted your edits on the page because of template for how it should be, boxes like that only go on the main page of the show. I know it takes a lot of time to do, but to save you time while you're new here, just ask me if you should do it and I'll tell you if it will be allowed or it. I only mean this for huge edits, it's annoying taking time to do something then it gets reverted (if I didn't do it, somebody else would have). Obviously it's up to you though, just trying to help! :) Jayy008 (talk) 18:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Series Overview

It was actually you LOL. You removed the "only include" part form season 3 which affected the List of page. Jayy008 (talk) 14:14, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

O, because I only edited that page a couple of days ago, then came on it today and found the season 3 like it was, i admit i did have a go at removing and resorting it, but i didnt mena to make it worse :( thanks for fixing it Mjs2010 (talk) 16:26, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

It's fine, just be careful with season pages because they always link to another page. Jayy008 (talk) 19:07, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

90210 (season 3)

Please do not inflate ratings on the page. The average overnight figures for the premiere was 1.98. Jayy008 (talk) 13:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

One Tree Hill

Are those episode counts correct that you've added to the "List of..." page? Jayy008 (talk) 14:14, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Should be, I got them from IMDB Mjs2010 (talk) 03:47, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

That's good then, definitely reliable. Are you going to keep them up-to-date? Jayy008 (talk) 16:06, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

I thought that I would update it when its at the season/mid season final, and then if its picked up for a full season, at the end of the season. Mjs2010 (talk) 04:04, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Good plan. Jayy008 (talk) 13:39, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Theme song

I wouldn't object to that, but it would need to be sourced. What I'd do is put it next to the "This episode title comes from the song by..." in the episode section. Jayy008 (talk) 12:07, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, ok, I normally find out who sings the theme song from some websites as they upload a link from youtube for the fans to see. Would it be too hard/messy to make a table, and put them in that way? Mjs2010 (talk) 14:02, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

A table wouldn't be correct. Either way, it all needs to be reliably sourced. Jayy008 (talk) 19:51, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Images

The image you uploaded fails copyright, an image has to be free to use for it to be allowed here. I removed it from the article as it will be deleted soon. Jayy008 (talk) 13:35, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Ahhhhh, slow down lol! You keep uploading lots of images. Images that are not free, have to be significantly important to be allowed for use. Season 1 has one DVD cover (No other DVD cover will ever be allowed) and a cast photo, which is important because it's the first cast and has changed since. The Clothes Over Bro's image isn't allowed because a free alternative can exist if you went and took a photo, for example. I think the bruising image should be allowed, but I need to fix it. Jayy008 (talk) 13:39, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Hey, Sorry lol, by doing these things I am learning, but I am sorry to put you through it, haha. Sorry again :) Mjs2010 (talk) 04:56, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Lol, it's fine. I just think for the time being show me the image first and I'll tell you if it can be used. The one you just uploaded to Haley will likely be deleted soon too. Jayy008 (talk) 14:25, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Harry Potter

Can you please justify your inclusion for the AUS/NZ release date of Deathly Hallows in the infobox? BOVINEBOY2008 11:56, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

As majority of the gross revenue does come from the US and UK, Australia also contributes to the gross, all 6 movies, Australia make up at least 25-35% of the profit, i feel therefore it should be up on the release dates, and as it is also released before the US and UK.

Okay, thank you for replying. Your second explanation goes along with the guideline, as it is the first release (at least that is sourced), and so that makes sense. But note that we don't include release dates in the infobox because it grosses well in certain countries, we only include a very limited few. Reviewing the guidelines at MOS:FILM will make editing much less frustrating for everyone in the future. Also, remember to sign your posts with ~~~~. BOVINEBOY2008 14:49, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Ref name

Please be careful when you move around ref names. A link can't just be "ref name" it has to have a full link during the article or the ref name won't work, it just ruins the article. Jayy008 (talk) 20:16, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

What page was this? Mjs2010 (talk) 20:18, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

One Tree Hill, season 8. Jayy008 (talk) 20:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Season 8

Hello, I feel like I'm always moaning at you, but I'd rather tell you than you be blocked. I said above don't put higher ratings for shows. Changing the source to overnight ratings because they're higher is vandalism. Finals are used in articles. Please stop, if other people catch you, it's likely you'll be warned then blocked straight away. Jayy008 (talk) 15:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

No, I don't mind you telling me these things, its better I know so I dont do it in the future. Mjs2010 (talk) 20:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

That's good. People can be so difficult on here, when you begin reverting edits from them, you'll see what they're like lol. You been watching season 8? Jayy008 (talk) 20:29, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

No, Im from Australia, and we dont have one tree hill on here, so I buy the season from ebay as soon as they're out in the states, at the moment thought im up to episode 17 of season 7, so not too far behind lol, you? Mjs2010 (talk) 04:33, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Lol, that's not too bad. Strange it's not on TV. I'm completely up to date, I'm from the UK but watch it online using MegaVideo, I still buy it, though, so it's not that bad :). Jayy008 (talk) 18:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

OTH - Season 8

She's been written off the show, so one can only assume she's not in it any more. So it's important to note that in the starring section. Jayy008 (talk) 17:41, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Wow! Really, do we know why? I only removed it because there was no source, but why is Alex leaving! Mjs2010 (talk) 23:26, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

No Idea. She's still on the credits, but she's been written out. I don't want to say why, unless you don't care about spoilers? But the door is open to return for the character, I say she could come back by the back-nine if she continues what she's doing, if she decides she made a mistake, she could be back at any time. Jayy008 (talk) 19:20, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Ahh ok, even though Alex was really annoying majority of season 7, I still liked her, thanks for letting me know without trying to give anything away lol. How do you feel about the big "event" that is going to happen at the end of the season? Mjs2010 (talk) 21:24, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

I agree! She wasn't nice, but she was great, like an older Rachel. I still would rather Rachel be a part of the show, though. And I'm really happy! I hope somebody dies, somebody big. Like if Karen or somebody returns. I haven't been emotional about an important regular for a long time. How do you feel about it? Jayy008 (talk) 21:27, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Lol, I loved Rachel too, not so much season 7, but season 3,4 and 5 I liked her. OMG, I didnt want to say it just incase you didnt know! When I found out I felt like it was the OC allover again. I really wanna see the set get completly destroyed! Damage, and drama haha, maybe Jamie can get washed away...... lol Mjs2010 (talk) 21:32, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

I agree, Rachel had more substance back then, she seems to have lost her heart. And yeah, I know, I added it to the artlce lool. And did something similar happen in The OC, then? And yeah, lool, the whole set. Haha, that's mean! That would be really sad, though! Jayy008 (talk) 21:38, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

The OC had an earthquake in its last season (I hope this is not OTH's final season) but no, I want some characters to be in danger, not Clay and Quinn casue their new, like Brooke, or Nathan.....Do you rekon Lucas and Peyton are gonna return?? I have hopes as the CW orded the back nine eps :) Mjs2010 (talk) 21:41, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

I think, just as Brooke finds happiness, she won't be in danger. I think Haley or Nathan. I do think they're going to return. Schwahn said that if they are too busy for the wedding, he'll try get the back later. He said everyone's interested, so that's good. A return would surely bring ratings back up! Jayy008 (talk) 21:45, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

I think thats why the CW orded more eps, cause a return of LP was on the table :), You know who I want back.....Sam! I loved her :(

That's one reason, but it's doing okay too. Not great, but okay. I can't see how they can keep it going, though. And I loved Sam too, I'd love to see her at Brooke's wedding! Jayy008 (talk) 22:01, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Hogwarts

Hi there, you recently changed the caption on the Hogwarts article. I have undone your change for two reasons:

• The image is from a film adaptation, not the book.
• The image is actually a screen shot from Goblet of Fire not Philosophers Stone.

Cheers Carl Sixsmith (talk) 08:16, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Thats ok, but that image of Hogwarts is not from Goblet of Fire, it is from Philosopher's Stone, during the scene where Harry takes Hedwig outside for a fly, and she flys through the catles, the scene then continues on to Hermione, Ron and Harry in the Libary so it is from PS. Secondly, the castle from Move 1/2/3 is very differnt from the castle of movie 4, the towers changed height, and the Quidditch pitch has moved from that location twice.

Mjs2010 (talk) 09:23, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Should really be deleted then, or the fare use statement be updated? Carl Sixsmith (talk) 10:30, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

I think any screen cap move 4 onwards is ok for now, but the castle has changed again for the battle scene in DH 2 so maybe we change it to castle move 4+ or put the note below the image stating what move it is? I'm new to this, and dont want to cause a fuss at all :) Mjs2010 (talk) 12:06, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Ratings

Absolutely! As soon as the finals come out later I will add them into the article. I'm great thanks, you? Jayy008 (talk) 17:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Pages

I'm not going to ask you to stop creating pages, but it is a waste of your time because I keep redirecting. The pages have no notability, they need to have media coverage, lots of sources and production information. See 90210 pilot for an example. Jayy008 (talk) 20:05, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Ok, but why did you get rid of episode 7x01? That page has been up for around 4-5 months. Mjs2010 (talk) 04:43, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

And also the ratings for episode 7x22 were 2.01, I remember feeling down about the low season final results, btw, have you seen episode 8x14 yet?? Lets be superheroes :P haha Mjs2010 (talk) 04:46, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I didn't know it was there, if I did, I would have removed it 5 months ago. Yeah, sorry, I thought it was episode 1 that was changed. Is there a source for 7x22? I know the numbers correct, just need a source! LOL, I haven't seen it yet. I can't wait, though! Jayy008 (talk) 15:54, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Last nights ratings are depressing. Series low's in all categories. Jayy008 (talk) 19:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Ouch! Just saw the ratings! :( Well, with what the promo offered, really, what esle were we to get haah! t least we beat Gossip Girl this week! haha. Nexts weeks OTH, doesnt look that good either, another week of bad rasults me thinks :( Mjs2010 (talk) 22:21, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Lol, OTH didn't beat GG, GG got a 0.8 in A18-49. 90210 was the second highest rated show behind VD so far this week. I really enjoyed the superhero ep, nobody else did, it seems! lol Jayy008 (talk) 21:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Again, OTH doesnt air here, so I have to wait for season 8 to come out on DVD to see it :P haha, it looked ok, but I have to see it all, before i make a final judgement lol. I really do hope it gets a season 9, it want the show to have 200 episodes so badly! were only 30 or so eps away from getting that! haha Mjs2010 (talk) 04:20, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Lol, oh :/. Yeah so do I! A "Final season" with Chad and Hilarie (for a few eps, to kill her off). A final season would increase ratings. They should move it to Friday's at 8. Jayy008 (talk) 18:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Neighbours 2011 Ratings

The article Neighbours 2011 Ratings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:IINFO The relevant information is already included in the main Neighbours article, so there is no need for a seperate list.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JuneGloom Talk 23:25, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Why must you be so difficult!? I've read the second link, and feel the page is neat and easy to read. However, once 2011 is over, we can delete this page. You complain this is a long article of statistics, why don't you look at the Home and Away page which has a list of all the 1988, 2010 and 2011 episodes on the page, that is far longer than this one. I'm asking you one last time, stop trying to get rid of the article!

List of One Tree Hill characters

I'm sorry it's taken me a while to reply. I see somebody has already reverted your edits. The reason being is that they're not supposed to be former and current because it's a page for the whole series and not each season. See Characters of Smallville for a perfect article and guideline. Jayy008 (talk) 17:22, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Season 6 ratings

You should know that when I make an edit - It's correct. The season 6 ratings I added were finals, the ones from TV by the Numbers were overnight numbers. I have reverted your edits. As I've said before, please don't change things based on what's higher, that's vandalism. Besides, the finals are mostly higher than the overnights anyway. As for the OTH template, I agree with why it was removed. It mis-leads readers into thinking that OTH's main page only has past information and not current. The template should only be used for sport, anyway, I shouldn't have added it in the first place. Jayy008 (talk) 15:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Ar k, sorry Mjs2010 (talk) 15:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

OTH

It goes against guidelines to have cast sections, sorry! Also, yes, the site is just as reliable. TV by the Numbers is preferred as it's easier to navigate, but their archives are so hard to find. Jayy008 (talk) 18:12, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Ok, stupid guidlines, it was so much easier to see who was in what season! Mjs2010 (talk) 23:36, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm a fan of it too. But it's one of those things I don't want to bring up again. However, there is a silver lining as we can include the guest stars in the episode summary as I did in Season 8. Have you seen it? PS. Sorry I reverted your character changes page, tables don't go on character pages. Jayy008 (talk) 17:15, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

By the way, I'm adding the ratings for Season 2 and 3 soon! Jayy008 (talk) 17:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Thats fine :P It only took 5 hours to make haha :P Wow! S2 and S3 Ratings!! YAY. I really wanted to know thoes ratngs for ages, but couldnt find them! You're the best for finding them! :) Mjs2010 (talk) 00:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

I know, it looked like it took a lot of effort. But I really want to nominate it for Good Article one day. Can't have dis-allowed things on their :/. Yeah, I've wanted them for ages I just couldn't find sources until now, but thanks for the kind words :) Jayy008 (talk) 19:41, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Years 1-7 Blu Ray Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Years 1-7 Blu Ray Cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 12:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Blocking

You'll likely continue to be blocked if you remove blocking templates from your page. Jayy008 (talk) 13:53, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Huh? How did you know? Mjs2010 (talk) 13:57, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

I saw it on your page (in my watch-list), then it was gone via an edit you made. All shows up in your history. Jayy008 (talk) 14:02, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

He can remove the templates now that the block has expired. The template, the reasoning, the warning against further actions, and the block log are all still there, quite assessable to the next admin who needs them. As long as the actions that led to the block don't happen again, he won't get another block for removing the note, blocks are not "scarlet letters" intended to as a badge of shame. Courcelles 14:04, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

@Jayy008 Is that a good thing that I;m on your watch list :P and at @Courcelles, I;m still new to Wikie, so i thought when I uploaded the image, i thought all the required informtations was there.

Even I learn something everyday! Also, the ratings for season 1 don't exist for free online, I will be doing season 5 in two weeks, season 2 the week after and season 3 the week after that. Jayy008 (talk) 23:00, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Vsmith (talk) 14:23, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring case removal

In regards to you deleting the case filed against you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, I have filed a request for administrator intervention at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. If you would like to explain your actions, your case is at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Edit-warring_editor_blanking_case_filed_against_him. Betty Logan (talk) 14:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

List of highest-grossing films

In regards to your constant removal of content from List of highest-grossing films, there is a discussion on the talk page at Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_films#Company_information_removal. Please participate in the discussion where we can discuss a solution that is agreeable to all parties. Betty Logan (talk) 14:33, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Blocking

You don't really report. When you're in edit war, you both get blocked either way. We don't include the full episode list until we know all the details of those episodes, they also need to be source (titles etc). Jayy008 (talk) 18:16, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Neighbours 2011 Ratings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neighbours 2011 Ratings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neighbours 2011 Ratings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Muhandes (talk) 19:38, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Neighbours 2011 Ratings. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. –anemoneprojectors– 20:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

This issue has already been settled! Mjs2010 (talk) 03:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi Mjs2010. For future reference, even if you think an issue is settled, you cannot remove an AfD notice. That's only for the closing administrator to do. As for the issue itself, I made my concerns clear at the deletion discussion page so I will not repeat them here. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 11:52, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Renewals and more.

I'll get this out of the way first, no, we will never be friends lol. I don't appreciate rude and disrespectful people. I'm completely up-date-date with the U.S. at the moment, I watch online. I can't wait until June when it gets shown here. We'll know about renewals between May 20 and the end of May. It won't be in June. Usually we get early renewals in February but The CW ratings have been so terrible recently, I doubt we'll see any. 90210 is dead-set for another season, just for the reason that they don't have the money to promote loads of new shows as Smallville and LUX already won't be back. My guess is they won't cancel anymore if James, Sophia and Bethany agree to return to OTH without a pay-rise. If they don't, OTH will most definitely end. Jayy008 (talk) 23:01, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing until you learn how to collaborate and communicate in a civil and respectful manner, and not insulting people, you are blocked. Your history so far has been one of disruption, copyright violations, vandalism, and now personal attacks. This is not what Wikipedia is to be used for, and your attitude is not conducive to a collaborative environment, as particularly evidenced by your comment on J04n's talk page.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles 03:27, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mjs2010 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Insert My work on wikipedia articles was not vandalism, my attempts to resolve the issue surrounding the Neighbours ratings page seemed to fall on deaf ears, hence why I got angry, and said thing, I'm sorry for the personal attack, but I just felt I wasnt heard from others proply. I'm still very knew to Wikipedia, so when I comes to images, I do fill out what I can, I'm still learning all about the copyright polocies, and when I do get giving links to such articles about the copyright, It does tend to go over the head, as it is very confussing, And If you could step im my shoes, and remember, being a new editor on Wikie is very hard. Sorry about the personal attacks, I lot my cool, as you have noticed, this issue about the Neighbours page has gone on for a while, and all communications between the said users surrounding the argument, has been minimum.Mjs2010 (talk) 04:18, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you cannot write an unblock request in correct English, I am unconvinced that you are an asset to Wikipedia, particularly given that you admit that you do not understand our copyright rules. Yes, I can step in your shoes, as I too have once been a new editor, and I have never felt the need to insult others.  Sandstein  18:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• If ever you come back here to request an unblock, note that the fact that you have attempted to evade your block by using a sockpuppet means that you will have to provide an even more convincing reason for unblocking than would otherwise have been the case. JamesBWatson (talk) 23:52, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Years 1-7 Blu Ray Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Years 1-7 Blu Ray Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:13, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mid onetreehill602 0019-1-.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mid onetreehill602 0019-1-.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 14 August 2015 (UTC)