User talk:Moebiusuibeom

Welcome...

Hello, Moebiusuibeom, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some useful pages to help you get started:

I hope you'll enjoy contributing as much as I do. When posting on discussion pages, please sign your messages. To do this, type four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

You are seeing this because in my patrols for vandalism, I saw you had edited a page. I also noticed that your talk page (this page) had a red link. That meant that the talk page didn't exist yet. I am sorry you can't eat the cookies, but they are still fresh. If you find a way to enjoy them, let me know. Will (Talk - contribs) 07:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Estacion Federico Lacroze-.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Estacion Federico Lacroze-.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Please!, if you took that picture, change the current licence tag to any of the following (see which one best fit you): {{PD-self}}, {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}}, {{GFDL-self}}, {{FAL}} or {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}}. Thanks --Mariano(t/c) 12:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mariano, pleased to meet you, I'm new at wikipedia's protocol, it's not easy but keeps my mind exercised y como sos argentino continuare en castellano, soy Jorge, medio Porteño, Santafesino y Entrerriano, criado en otros lares, multicultural.

Todavía tengo problemas con las fotos, como al principio tuve dificulates con las licencias las estoy descargando de esta forma, la foto es de un compañero fotógrafo de Palomar, el me las esta supliendo, por favor ilustrame sobre las licencias y cual usar, algunas fotos son mias.

Tampoco puedo bajarlas en wikipedia en español, no tengo idea porque, aunque posiblemente se debe a que mi "browser" ya que opero con Mac y systema 9.02 ya antiquado. He colaborado extensamente en Wikipedia en ingles y español, me expreso mejor en ingles, últimamente me estoy cruzando con vándalos que desean hacer las cosas de su forma sin consultar, la página de Tranvía es una y en la de Light Rail y Tram en "usa" hay problemas de comprención sobre este medio de transporte. Te escribo todo esto porque creo que encontré un aliado, en especial después de descubrir que existe Wikipedia:WikiProject Argentina, ahora vamos a ver hasta cuando dura la fiebre, aqui unas páginas desarrolladas y realzadas por mi:

El Palomar, Buenos Aires (cambios extensos version ingles, con enfasis al urbanismo)

World Urbanism Day en (mia personal version ingles/español)

Villa General Belgrano (mia personal version ingles, aqui me quitaron la imagen)

La Cumbrecita (mia personal version ingles/español)

List of car-free places (Argentina y otros)

Car-free zone (Argentina)

List of cycleways (South America)

List of heritage railways (Argentina y Chile)

Santo Domingo Metro (Ingles)

entre muchas otras y con cambios minimos y links, tambien creo que devemos ayudar a nuestros hermanos de hispanoamerica!

Vienen traducciones al Frances, Italiano y Alemán.

((es) Moebiusuibeom... Saludos, (en) (ex Ciudad jardín) user info coming soon> – Moebiusuibeom 16:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Que tal Jorge. Bueno, hay un par de cosas que queria explicarte, pero antes que nada, no te sientas perseguido si hacen cambios al texto que escribas, o borran imagenes que subiste.

Primero, queria comentarte que hay una politica muy estricta sobre personas con multiples usuarios. Es principalmente para evitar vandalismos y fraudes en las innumerables votaciones que se hacen, por lo que te ruego que uses siempre el mismo usuario.
Segundo, las imagenes que se suben, asi como los textos, deben tener una licencia compatible con la politica de Wikipedia de libertad de contenidos. Podes leer un poco de eso en GNU Lesser General Public License, Public domain y Creative Commons. En pocas palabras, si vos sacaste una foto, podes vos mismo decir esto se lo dejo a la humanidad para que cada uno haga lo que quiera con ella, pero si la foto no la sacaste vos, entonces no tenes esa facultad. Eso impide a la gente subir imagenes de revistas o medios graficos que podrian demandar a Wikipedia por abuso de copyright.
Tercero, las imagenes que subas, siempre que puedas proveerlas de una licencia abierta, tenes que etiquetarlas como tales. Es deseable, ademas, que las subas en commons:, ya que las imagenes subidas alla son visibles desde todas las wikipedias, por lo que no hace falta tenerlas duplicadas en la wikpiedia en ingles y en castellano. Vas a tener que hacerte un usuario alla.
Cuarto, nadie es dueño de un articulo. Por mas que vos hayas creado un articulo, eso no quiere decir que vayas a administrarlo o a tener un control mayor sobre el mismo por sobre cualquier otro usuario.

No se si te queda alguna duda en el tintero, contactame si es asi, o si necesitas ayuda con cualquier cosa. Preguntale a tu amigo si realmente quiere permitir a cualquier persona usar su imagen, incluso con fines comerciales. Si te dice que si, reemplaza la etiqueta de warning que tiene la imagen con, probablemente, {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} o {{LGPL}}.

Un abrazo, --Mariano(t/c) 11:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Paran? Min?, San Fernando.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Paran? Min?, San Fernando.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Image:Alstom Metropolis.jpg

Um, hi. I'm rely not sure what you are trying to tell me... Spanish is not my strongest language. Are you saying Image:Alstom Metropolis.jpg was found on Google, or do you want to just add it to the article you mentioned? If it's the later just add it like any other image ([[Image:Alstom Metropolis.jpg|thumb|some caption]]). --Sherool (talk) 07:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alstom Metropolis.jpg

Bueno...al paracer hablas español???je je...podrias porfavor usar esa imagen de Alstom Metropolis.jpg para la Pagina del Futuro Metro De Santo Domingo..Santo Domingo Metro. bien Reciente lei un articulo que me informo que ese modelo de tren sera el que se va dar uso en esa ciudad........Gracias...User:EdwinCasadoBaez

Re:Alstom Metropolis.jpg

Well... I been searching sites but i guess the Dominican Government or people haven't released alot Of Pictures to the internet..Besides This. All this Copyright licenses are getting my head upside down.

Thanks For the editing

Well yeah my native language is Spanish...I'm working on the english..maybe u could help me out sometime!Thanks for the advice User:EdwinCasadoBaez

Re:Villa Paranacito

Hi Meobius. I understand your concer regarding the article, but let answer to your questions:

"Obviously, vegetables are not shy being photograph." is not a phrase to have in an encyclopedia. Feel free to add a comment such as "Such boats are seen throughout the Delta, especially in Villa Paranacito.".
Wikipedia is not a travel blog. Sites offering tours and services are not welcome, specially if they are not directly connected to the article itself. I'm affraid that such link is considered spam and has to be removed.
I removed the See also section because Tigre was already linked in the text of the article, and it wasn't that important to propose it again.

You are doing a really nice job. If you are for a constructive critic: try keeping things encyclopedical, both in the contents and the text you write. You might feel like taking a look to the preferred manual of style. Good wiking, Mariano(t/c) 12:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:La Cumbrecita chapel.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:La Cumbrecita chapel.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:La Cumbrecita chapel.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:La Cumbrecita chapel.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 10:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Caballito.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Caballito.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 21:01, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Rose-Marie.mr.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Rose-Marie.mr.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Rose-Marie.mr.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Rose-Marie.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Rose-Marie.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Rose-Marie.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Rose-Marie.hr2.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Rose-Marie.hr2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Rose-Marie.hr2.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Rose-Marie.highres.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Rose-Marie.highres.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Rose-Marie.highres.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

==

Image permission problem with Image:Rose-Marie.HR.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Rose-Marie.HR.jpg, which you've sourced to Luis Jahn. I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ==

Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:MG 0164 Alstom-stophloidis.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MG 0164 Alstom-stophloidis.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sunset in delta of Parana 2.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sunset in delta of Parana 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:44, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:La Cumbrecita chapel-hr.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:La Cumbrecita chapel-hr.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:47, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Lancha Interislenia.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lancha Interislenia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:51, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Parana Mini, San Fernando 2.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Parana Mini, San Fernando 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:53, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Fruit Boat.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fruit Boat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Estacion Palomar.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Estacion Palomar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Estacion Federico Lacroze-2.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Estacion Federico Lacroze-2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]