User talk:Moha ennaji

Welcome!

Hello, Moha ennaji, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --David Biddulph (talk) 10:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

You ought to read Wikipedia:User pages. Your user page ought to be a description of you in the context of your Wikipedia editing, not a place for a Wikipedia article. The article on you is at Moha Ennaji and there shouldn't be similar content at User:Moha ennaji. Your user talk page is primarily for messages from, and discussion with, other editors; it therefore should usually be in English, as this is the English Wikipedia. As you have been editing an article about yourself, you ought to read Wikipedia's guidance on conflict of interest. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your recent edits to Moha Ennaji, as you gave no explanation in an edit summary. Other editors have been working to improve the article, and it isn't clear why you reverted those improvements. One specific problem with the article is that you keep introducing external links within the body of the article text, and Wikipedia doesn't accept that. I suggest that you take some time to learn about Wikipedia's conventions, and let other people work on improving the article. Also please read the conflict of interest guidance which has been pointed out to you previously. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User name/conflict of interest

based on your edits,

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Moha ennaji", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is the name of a living person. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you.

or if you are Moha Ennaji

Hello, Moha ennaji. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links

If you are going to edit the article at Moha Ennaji (despite the warnings above regarding conflict of interest), please observe Wikipepia's guidance regarding external links. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You were told about this problem more than 3 years ago, you were reminded about it again yesterday, but you are persisting in violating the instructions at WP:external links. If you carry on with this behaviour it is likely to be treated as tendentious editing, and dealt with accordingly. I will give you time to convert any relevant external links in the text to references or to wikilinks, but if you don't do that I will remove the text including the external links. --David Biddulph (talk) 12:30, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Moha Ennaji. - You have been warned repeatedly about Wikipedia's treatment of external links. Your continued violation of the guidance given is obviously tendentious editing. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of maintenance templates

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Moha Ennaji, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --David Biddulph (talk) 12:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]