User talk:MrVenaCava
Welcome!
|
Speedy deletion nomination of 239 Tenth Avenue
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on 239 Tenth Avenue, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. North America1000 11:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: 111 Murray Street (June 15)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:111 Murray Street and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! MrVenaCava,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Libby norman (talk) 00:21, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: 250 South Street has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
--Anarchyte 08:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: 126 Madison Avenue has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy (talk) 21:08, 6 July 2015 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: 111 Murray Street has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Flat Out (talk) 05:38, 10 July 2015 (UTC)AfC notification: Draft:Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine has a new comment
[edit]Your submission at Articles for creation: Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine (August 10)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! MrVenaCava,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:18, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy (talk) 03:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for May 6
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stop Trump movement, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dan Miller and Michael Graham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Discussion at talk:Stop Trump movement#RfC: Should this article list people who have merely stated that they will not endorse, support, or vote for Trump?
[edit]You are invited to join the discussion at talk:Stop Trump movement#RfC: Should this article list people who have merely stated that they will not endorse, support, or vote for Trump?. Please don't list people in the article who oppose Trump unless sources clearly state that they have made an effort to prevent Trump's nomination as part of the Stop Trump movement. - MrX 11:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- @MrX Fair enough. Thanks! MrVenaCava (talk) 14:09, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
In regards to "see talk page", what exactly am I supposed to be looking for? The most recent discussion there is pretty involved. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 02:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- @ Erpert. It's been discussed in the talk page that I'm merging the general and primary sections into one list, now that there is a separate article that documents the primary endorsements. Your edit reverted the merging. MrVenaCava (talk) 02:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
July 2016
[edit] Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of Hillary Clinton presidential campaign endorsements, 2016— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Oshwah -- I'm a little confused. Can you elaborate on how those edits are not constructive? Thank you. MrVenaCava (talk) 04:12, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Not sure what happened, to be honest. I'm wondering if I reverted the wrong edit? Anyways, I've stricken out the warning and I apologize for the confusion. Thanks for letting me know about this. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:11, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Clinton endorsements
[edit]Mr. VC, if there are "specific circumstances" in which the various Hillary Clinton Facebook endorsements are warranted as RS, then each of them should be specified. My effort in paring down the massive endorsement listing is modest and IAW WP editing guidelines. Please help out. For example , if the various Twitter endorsements are not from verified WP:Twitter-EL accounts, they should be removed as well. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 03:41, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, MrVenaCava. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, MrVenaCava. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, MrVenaCava. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
February 2019
[edit]Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:List of Bernie Sanders 2020 presidential campaign endorsements, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 07:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC)