User talk:MsSalsaFish

Welcome!

Hi MsSalsaFish! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 21:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MsSalsaFish

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:MsSalsaFish requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CNMall41 (talk) 21:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I have moved content from your page User:MsSalsaFish to your sandbox page, to prevent it from being deleted under the U5 criteria for speedy deletion, as it appears to be the development of a new article, but in the wrong place. Remember that your user page is not the right place to develop new articles, see Wikipedia:User pages for more information. Instead, you can be your sandbox page or a draft. The old content is now avaliable at User:MsSalsaFish/sandbox.

Thanks! InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 21:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the assistance which is greatly appreciated. Being a new user is intimidating and a learning curve. MsSalsaFish (talk) 01:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Promise Neighborhoods of the Lehigh Valley (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Promise Neighborhoods of the Lehigh Valley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:00, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MsSalsaFish! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:00, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Promise Neighborhoods of the Lehigh Valley (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

The references I have checked are not appropriate. They are churnalism, thus Primary sources. This makes your draft look like an advert, which will not be accepted. You have work to do.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Promise Neighborhoods of the Lehigh Valley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello MsSalsaFish. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MsSalsaFish. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MsSalsaFish|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Since you have ignored the question about your statement 'The article is professional and neutral and written by a third party' at tghe AFC Helpdesk, I am now putting it to you formally 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:46, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TimTrent. Thank you for the feedback. Please note that I have not responded prior because I am very busy and cannot check the status and updates as regulary as you post. Thank you for your patience. I am new to Wikipedia and am still learning the Wiki language and formatting. No, I am not a paid advocate. I am, however, very passionate about advocacy and community health and wellness. Much like all individuals creating Wikipedia articles, the articles are developed to contribute to the Wiki community. I am learning and will provided a revised edit this week. MsSalsaFish (talk) 12:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. This simple declaration is all that is required to answer the formal question.

Now please attend to explaining 'The article is professional and neutral and written by a third party' 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The statement was in response to inital questions of neutrality. Perhaps poorly worded, it was my attempt to state that I am simply a "wiki contributer." Again, learning my way around, what appears, to be a steep learning curve. MsSalsaFish (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hasshan Batts (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hasshan Batts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]