User talk:Munnifar
 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of 87.57.15.133 (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Zariane (talk) 21:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
March 2008
[edit] Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Business plan. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. The booklet is not about business plans. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 21:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Business plan. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 21:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Business plan. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 21:51, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Gwernol 21:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Munnifar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This was my first day as a contributor to WIKI, the content I uploaded to "Venture Capital" and "Business Plan" were perfectly OK, however some editors deleted it and blocked me. They did not compare my stuff to what already were there, and in response mail they claimed that it was not theier problem. My stuff undoubtly added to the content, please unblock
Decline reason:
Please read up our guideline on external links. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 11:57, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Munnifar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have again read up the WP:EL, and the stuff I linked to were perfectly in line with the guidelines in WP:EL. please check for yourselves http://booklet.krull.dk. I simply not understand why another administrator just blocked me and the content, since it is fully in line with WP:EL rules. As requested I have again read up MaxSem as per his request
Decline reason:
As you were warned, Wikipedia is not a mere repository for links, and it appears that you still do not fully understand our external links policy; thus, I feel that unblocking is not the best course of action at this time. — slakr\ talk / 13:25, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|Dear Administrators, I am very sorry for the trouble that I caused, I am have complied with all requests made as per above. My incorrect behavior was a result of being new to the site, not to disturbe any. All actions we done in my first day (hours) and then I was block. I do deeply regret the troble caused, and hope block can be lifted so we can share all our common knowledge}}.
