User talk:Nada Bonna

Welcome!

Hello, Nada Bonna, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Nada Bonna/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! VViking_TalkEdits 13:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nada Bonna/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Nada Bonna/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VViking_TalkEdits 13:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nada Bonna/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:35, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nada Bonna! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:35, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Nada Bonna/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Nada Bonna/sandbox. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello Nada Bonna. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nada Bonna. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nada Bonna|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Timtrent,

I adopted my cat, Candy, around six years ago and since then I have been a regular customer of Petzone. My loyalty to Petzone started when I for the first time had a cat and did not know how to look after it! I took my cat, who was a 2-month kitten then, to the only qualified pet store in Kuwait. The store staff educated me on how to take care of the kitten. They gave me full and detailed guidelines on what and when to feed my kitten.

My cat transformed from an abandoned and injured kitten to a six-year-old, healthy, and happy cat! A month ago, while I was waiting for my cat to finish her grooming routine, I had a small talk with the store manager telling him that I am very satisfied with their services and that I would like to do anything for them in return. “Why don’t you write about us?” The store manager said jokingly.

Owing Petzone, I decided to publish an article about Petzone on Wikipedia, since it does not have one, considering all the guidelines and regulations. The intention of this article is NOT to promote or advertise Petzone, yet my purpose is to share reliable information about Petzone that I found by Google search. However, this is my first experience with Wikipedia and I am enjoying it! Nada Bonna (talk) 13:21, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to User:Nada Bonna/sandbox, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Nada Bonna, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nada Bonna|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:16, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Timtrent,

I adopted my cat, Candy, around six years ago and since then I have been a regular customer of Petzone. My loyalty to Petzone started when I for the first time had a cat and did not know how to look after it! I took my cat, who was a 2-month kitten then, to the only qualified pet store in Kuwait. The store staff educated me on how to take care of the kitten. They gave me full and detailed guidelines on what and when to feed my kitten.

My cat transformed from an abandoned and injured kitten to a six-year-old, healthy, and happy cat! A month ago, while I was waiting for my cat to finish her grooming routine, I had a small talk with the store manager telling him that I am very satisfied with their services and that I would like to do anything for them in return. “Why don’t you write about us?” The store manager said jokingly.

Owing Petzone, I decided to publish an article about Petzone on Wikipedia, since it does not have one, considering all the guidelines and regulations. The intention of this article is NOT to promote or advertise Petzone, yet my purpose is to share reliable information about Petzone that I found by Google search.

I would highly appreciate your support in guiding me on how to get my article published.

Thank you.

Best regards, Nada Bonna (talk) 13:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Draft:Petzone. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:19, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Petzone (October 18)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Curb Safe Charmer,

Hope all is well.

I tried publishing an article about "PETZONE" and it got rejected and deleted. My account has been blocked for "undisclosed paid" and I cannot ask any questions on "help desk".

I disclose that I am not being paid to write this article nor am I employed by the business in question. However, I have a cat and I am a regular customer of Petzone for around six years. Since they have helped my cat to stay well and live healthily, I want to do a favor for Petzone by publishing an article on Wikipedia.

I would highly appreciate your support in guiding me on how to get my article published.

Thank you.

Best regards, Nada Bonna (talk) 13:06, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Petzone

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Petzone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing your block

If you wish to appeal your block, please use the code below and replace the "Your reason here" text with your explanation. Also, please delete the "code" and "nowiki" tags if you are copying it from the edit window. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nada Bonna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am trying to publish an article about a business called Petzone. I disclose that I am not being paid to write this article nor am I employed by the business in question. However, I have a cat and I am a regular customer of Petzone for around six years. Since they have helped my cat to stay well and live healthily, I want to do a favor for Petzone by publishing an article on Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

You are attempting to mislead us and this will count against any future unblock request. You noted that you, personally, own the copyright to the Petzone logo at File:Petzone.jpg. A simple google search shows Nada Bonna works (or worked) as a content creator at Petzone. This reflects extremely poorly on you and on Petzone. Yamla (talk) 09:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nada Bonna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I have studied the rules and policies of Wikipedia and I would like to have another chance to edit please. May you please unblock me? Thank you.

Decline reason:

You will need to specifically tell us which rules you violated, how you will correct those violations, and what edits you intend to make in the future. I can tell you that you won't be unblocked to, in the near future, edit about Petzone. You will also need to address your dishonesty with us and tell why we should trust you going forward. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:17, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.