User talk:Naghmehetaati

Hi

Please could you read WP:TALK. It describes the purpose of pages like Talk:Hassan Rouhani. Talk pages are for discussing proposed changes to Wikipedia articles based on Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Your comments appear to be messages to Hassan Rouhani and so they do not belong on the talk page. I have therefore removed them. Sean.hoyland - talk 08:43, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Naghmehetaati. Thank you. Sean.hoyland - talk 08:11, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

طفا زبان انگلیسی در ویکیپدیای انگلیسی. صفحههای بحث مقاله برای بحث و گفتگو در مورد بهبود این مقاله، نه برای بحث های کلی در مورد موضوع این مقاله است.

(Using mechanical translator: Please post in English on English Wikipedia. Article talk pages are for discussions about improving the article, not for general discussion about the subject of the article.) BMK (talk) 09:14, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hi, Naghmehetaati. I'm afraid I've had to block you from editing, as all you do here is post in Persian on talkpages, and then people remove your posts, because that's not what talkpages are for on the English Wikipedia. If you're able to communicate in English, please explain what you're trying to do and why you think you should be unblocked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 16:38, 4 April 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naghmehetaati, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

——MelbourneStar☆^talk 12:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naghmehetaati, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Auric talk 17:20, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naghmehetaati, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Auric talk 10:55, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]