User talk:Nick.mon/Archive 3

2014

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Italian general election, 2006 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

first televised debate, held on 14 March, was broadcast live on [[Rai Uno]], and moderated by [Clemente Mimun, Director of ''[[TG1]]''. It featured questions from journalists Roberto Napoletano

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:36, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not re-add that inaccurate map of the Italian Empire again

You have repeatedly re-added inaccurate maps of the Italian Empire in the 1940s that show Italy possessing East Africa in 1942. You have done this after the error has been explained clearly in the notes section of the diffs, this is completely unacceptable and will not be tolerated any further. Italy lost East Africa by spring 1941, as the British fully occupied the territory by then, only sporadic resistance by some few remaining diehard Fascist guerilla forces continued afterwards. It did not possess Tunisia until late 1942 after it lost East Africa. Italy did not possess Tunisia and East Africa at the same time. If you reject this obvious fact and re-post a map showing Italy possessing East Africa in 1942, this should be considered deliberate disregard for fact-checking and historical accuracy and contempt for consensus-seeking protocol on Wikipedia, and you will be reported should this happen again. This is your final warning.--70.26.113.85 (talk) 00:57, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Forza Italia (2013), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azure (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2013 polls

I not only can, but I'm also trying too. The problem is, there are so many polls for the 2008-2013 period that work on it advances rather slowly, and has been halted for several months now. I'll try to do it whenever I can, but I don't promise anything. Cheers! Impru20 (talk) 14:37, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 20 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of Presidents of the United States page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cult of personality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2000s (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Silvio Berlusconi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Populist and Parliamentary Republic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your judgment about pictures

My dear friend, I must tell you that your judgement about picture qualitity is very poor. I am a professional photo editor since 40 years and you wanna tell me what is a good picture? I am very sorry!FraLiss (talk) 13:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/President of Emilia-Romagna concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/President of Emilia-Romagna, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your map of right-wing populist parties

File:Right-wing populist parties in European national parliaments 2013.png does not show Poland and Czech in light blue. However, Law and Justice is often categorised as a right-wing populist party and with Dawn of Direct Democracy there is a new right-wing populist party in the Czech Republic. And why are Macedonia, Serbia and Hungary dark blue? Which of the ruling parties in these countries are described as right-wing populist? Which are the right-wing populist party in Turkey and Romania? It would be great if you could provide an explanation in the summary field of the file to make it transparent to other users to comprehend why a certain country has this or that colour (and to continue and update the map if you should want to stop editing it some day...) Thank you! --RJFF (talk) 16:18, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ultranationalist is not the same as right-wing populist. "Right-wing populism" is a specific, defined term in political science. We cannot just equal distinct terms that may be similar or overlapping, but not identic.

According to whom are Hungarian Fidesz, Macedonian DPMNE, Bosnian SDS, Latvian National Alliance, Northern Irish DUP (btw you erroneously marked Great Britain instead of Northern Ireland), Portuguese CDS-PP right-wing populist parties? WP:V is valid not only for articles, but for all Wikipedia contents, including maps. Original research is forbidden for maps just as it is in articles. Kind regards --RJFF (talk) 19:57, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the map still needs some work: You write that the ideologies are according to parties-and-elections.eu. However, on this site, Fidesz, VMRO-DPMNE, Bosnian SDS, Ataka, HDSSB, HSP, French FN, Golden Dawn, Jobbik, Latvian NA, Order and Justice, Law and Justice, Portuguese CDS-PP, Svoboda and Northern Irish DUP are not classified as right-wing populist. In these cases you have to either cite another source, or remove them from the map. Thank you, --RJFF (talk) 13:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:La Destra logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:La Destra logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:12, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Nick.mon. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 15:54, 18 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 15:54, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:National Alliance logo.png

You are not allowed to have a good quality large image when it is non-free. 444 pixels is too big. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:44, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Logo of the Italian Socialist Party

This is the logo I did, a vectorized image, maybe not much better as you thought :( I have a problem with this file because I didn't put a correct license (like non-free logos), so please fix this as you can. If this logo result useless delete it for me. Regards --C records (talk) 11:52, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@C records:The logo is great! You did a magnificent job. Thank you very much! -- Nick.mon (talk) 14:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Democracy logo

@C records: Hi, sorry if I disturb you again, but I would ask to you to make another logo: the crossed shield of Christian Democracy party. Here there is an image. It will be great if you can make a logo also for the previous version of the crossed shield (here, and here in the background there is another image). Thank you very much! -- Nick.mon (talk) 13:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no problem, I'll try to do it today :) --C records (talk) 16:18, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Former Christian Democracy Logo.
Done Former Christian Democracy Logo.
Done Last Christian Democracy Logo.

I hope this helps, is there a mistake? --C records (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No they are wonderful! Thank you very much again! -- Nick.mon (talk) 14:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The logo of the Italian Socialist Party it was deleted from commons, so I uploaded again to English wikipedia as fair use content, this is because the logo have copyright and isn't a simply geometrical form, as you can see I put it again on the article (next time you'll do if you wants). Respect to the other 3 logos about Christian Democracy, probably one of them or all could be deleted in the future, if this happen please let me know. --C records (talk) 14:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, if it happens I will inform you. Thank you again. -- Nick.mon (talk) 15:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/President of Emilia-Romagna

Hello Nick.mon. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "President of Emilia-Romagna".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/President of Emilia-Romagna}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:00, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regional councillors in infoboxes

Hello Nick, I reverted your recent edits on Italian parties' infoboxes. We discussed before about having also the number of regional councillors and I explained to you as it was a deceptive information and that the movements of regional councillors are hard to track. Thus, for both conceptual and practical reasons, I ask you kindly not to upload those data again. Many thanks, --Checco (talk) 19:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Logo of NCD-UDC

@C records: Hello C records, sorry if I ask you again a favor, but it will be great if you could do the logo of NCD-UDC political alliance. Here there are some examples of the logo: repubblica.it and articolotre.com. The logo is composed by the logos of NCD and UDC parties, here there are their own logos, if you need them: NCD1, NCD2 and UDC. Thank you very much! -- Nick.mon (talk) 09:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:NCD-UDC Alliance Logo.svg

Done: NCD-UDC Alliance Logo

Hi Nick, how are you? No problem, this is the logo and I put the same license than the others, so if there is a problem with this or is deleted; you let me know to fix it. CYA. --C records (talk) 09:27, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@C records: Fine thanks, and you? The logo is wonderful! Ok if there will be problems about the license I will inform you. -- Nick.mon (talk) 09:35, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Color

Too many edits in wikipedia can sometimes be a sign of fanatism, and this could a problem for an objective and scientific encyclopedia. However, every edit, even if ancient, must be sourced (WP:SOURCES). Saying that an edit is very old, is not relevant. Every dispute must be resolved upon Sources. You was not a vandal in the past, but if you continue without showing them, you could become a vandal for the future.

In this case, red for the HL is urcourced and illogical. HL was a liberal and bourgeois faction, without any relation with Socialism (more, it opposed Socialism). Red for the HL, is simply an error. --87.5.160.71 (talk) 14:11, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Post scriptum" - I accept your explainations about the color of the Historical Right instead. If that code is used for the British Conservatives, that are the same political group of the Italian Historical Right, it can be accepted.--87.5.160.71 (talk) 14:23, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone can become a vandal, if he does not respect wikipedia guidelines: wiki does not grant diplomatic immunity to anyone. You have a relevant source in the History of the template page, but I can add you also "I percorsi della storia" by De Agostini.
And, by the way, dark or less, red means Socialism. I saw in your personal page you are a Socialist: you could know it.--87.5.160.71 (talk) 14:34, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, effectively the HL and the Republican party have a common origin. Mazzini and his Republicans were a part (the most leftist one) of the HL until the Rattazzi's "Connubio" in 1852. After that year, the Republicans (that were against every government made by the king) left the HL and joined The Extreme. But effectively, HL green and PRI green have the same origin. No problem for me to use the same color code, if you like.--87.5.160.71 (talk) 14:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the problem is that the HL was a "false" Left. It was a "left" simply because in the oligarchic Italian political system of the 19th century, the "real" left was banned by the electorate and was excluded by the Parliament. To understand the problem, you can think in opposition to the DDR Volkskammer: it obviously had some MPs sitting in the right-wing of the chamber, but you could say they were members of a "Rightist party"?--87.5.160.71 (talk) 14:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First thing to be understood: the Liberal Party (PLI) was a single party. When you are speaking about Giolitti's "Liberals", you are speaking about a coalition of parties. During the Kingdom, Italian elections (even at municipal and provincial level) were based upon majoritarian systems. When a country uses a proportional representation, as during Italian "First" Republic, parties are very important. When you use a majoritarian system (FPTP, two round system or block voting, it is not important), as during the Kingdom, or in present-day Italy or France, coalitions are more important than single parties. And PM Giolitti was supported by a coalition of Liberal parties, as PM Berlusconi was supported by a coalition of rightist parties, not by his single Forza Italia or PDL. What was the origin of Giolitti's coalition? Well, it was the merger of the Historical Left and the Historical Right, under a phenomenon that began as the so-called trasformismo. After the electoral reform of 1882, the HR had no more realistic chances to win an election (if you consider the HR a "right of the right" and the HL as a "left of the right", and the reform of 1882 as a "legalization of the centrist electorate", you can easily understand it), so many HR MPs began to join the HL simply because it was their sole possibility to rise to the government. When did the HL end? Well, there is not a date. I can say you that on January 1th, 1900, the merger between HL and HR was complete, and the Liberal coalition dominated the country because the "real" leftist electorate was still banned. The situation began to change after the electoral refor of 1913 that turned Italy into a real democracy. A real left-right mechanism allowed the "real" left to win many municipal elections in 1914 (Milan, Bologna), but the elections were stopped by WW1. When, after 1919, the possibility of a "real" leftist government became concrete at national level, we know what it happened... --87.5.160.71 (talk) 15:27, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Technically the PLI, which was founded in 1922 as an organized party, never had a PM. Thinking to the Liberal coalition, "1900" can be correct. The riots of 1897-98, which ended with the Bava-Beccaris massacre and the murder of King Humbert I, pushed the remaining reluctant HR MPs to join the HL government coalition.
By the way, I notice you an error in the list of the Italian PM you showed me. Rattazzi was a member of the HL, but his government were however supported only by the HR and some Independents. You can consider Rattazzi as a 19th century Pierferdinando Casini, a politician who was "border-line" and next to his opposite coalition. Rattazzi was supported by the HR (and not by the HL) simply because the incumbent HR's PM was heavily defeated by the electors, and the HR's MP wanted a period a minor governmental engagement to make the electors forget their errors. --87.5.160.71 (talk) 15:50, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I tried to create this account to begin to re-write all pages about monarchist Italy, as you ask me. Looking to those pages, I found a lot of errors.
Well, let's start. You asked me about the "Ministeriali" and the "Costituzionalisti". It's simple. I don't know if you know the concept of Constitutional Arch which was used during the "First" Italian Republic: the concept of "Costituzionalisti" was the same concept during the Kingdom. At time, the Italian "Constitution" was the Albertine Statute, which created a constitutional monarchy. The "Costituzionalisti" were all parties and politicians that supported, or at least accepted, the Statute, and consequently the constitutional monarchy as form of State. Both HL and HR were "Costituzionalisti". The "Ministeriali" were simply the MPs who supported the government (that, at time, was called "il Ministero", the Ministry, because differently from the Republic, during the Kingdom the Italian PM was one of the ministers). Consequently, the "Opposizione Costituzionale" (Constitutional Opposition) was the group of the "Costituzionalisti" who did not support the government. "Ministeriali"+"Opposizione Costituzionale"="Costituzionalisti", this was the sum. When the HR (blue) was ruling Italy, they were the "Ministeriali" and the HL (green) the "Opposizione Costituzionale", after 1876, it was the opposite. There were two political groups which were not "Costituzionalisti": on the left, "The Extreme" (red), which was composed by Radicals, Republicans and Socialists (an error to correct is speaking solely of the Radical Party, as it happens in the wiki electoral pages), and that wanted a republic and, as an obvious consequence, the abolition of the Statute (as it will happen in 1946); on the right, there were the "Clericals" who were the supporters of the Pope and claimed for the restauration of the Papal State and, consequently, the destruction of the young Italian State (an obviously its Statute: no more State, no more Statute). The Clericals were hugely limited by the non expedit, but were the "real" first Italian party: the turnout during the Kingdom was one of the lowest of all Europe, because Catholic-Clericals electors did not participate to the elections (and you can easily understand how the religion is important in Italy...). Even if officially the pope did not want that the Catholics would participate to the Italian political life, unofficially he likes a small group of Clericals (under the "Independents" flag) into Parliament for a simple reason: to spy the Italian State and its official documents. Ah, the color: the Clericals were black, as it happened and happens in German-speaking countries. Only when they were "legalized" by the Pope after WW1, and they became the People's Party, they changed their color into the white, the Pope's color, because they officially became supported by the Pope. Before, when they were simply "Clericals", they had not a leader, because officially they did not run to rule the country. --An helper of Nick (talk) 19:21, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ignazio Messina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Net (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gianni Rivera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Democrats (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

This is a minor edit Watch this page

By publishing changes, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.

Publish changes Show preview Show changes Cancel

The edit summary field appears above the "Save page" button

Hello Nick.mon,

please remember to provide edit summaries in order to make it easier for other users to identify what you have changed. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 15:37, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@RJFF: Yes you are absolutely right, excuse me, I will remember it. -- Nick.mon (talk) 16:33, 30 April 2014 (UTC

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Matteo Renzi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

E un fascicolo sull’uso dei fondi pubblici ]</ref> he is the second one of four children.<ref>[http://www.lanazione.it/firenze/politica/2012/09/13/771604-la-renzi-family-sostiene-online-la-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:40, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matteo Renzi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scout (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lorenzo Guerini (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lodi

Matteo Renzi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Football referee

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Italian general election, 2001 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:51, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Matteo Renzi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

by Renzi, whose supporters have been known as "Big Bangers", [[Now! (Italy)|Now!]] or ''Renziani''). The nature of Renzi's [[progressivism]] is a matter of debate and has been linked both to [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:41, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MSI

Hi Nick.mon, I am Maremmano! I saw your last edit in the page of MSI and I too think that It isn't the successor of the Fascist Party. Can you intervene too in this discussion that I opened?--Maremmano (talk) 21:19, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Democracy is Freedom – The Daisy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Italian general election, 1880