User talk:Nicoontheweb

Welcome!

Hello, Nicoontheweb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Nico McLane, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! R3ap3R.inc (talk) 16:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nico McLane

I have nominated Nico McLane, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nico McLane. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 16:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Nico McLane

A tag has been placed on Nico McLane, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -Senseless!... says you, says me 16:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Nico McLane, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. -Senseless!... says you, says me 16:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See Wikipedia:FAQ/Organization and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

This kind of activity is considered spamming and forbidden by policies, and also violates our username policy.

However, if you feel that there has been a mistake in your blocking, please appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below or email the administrator who blocked you. Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Please check that your new username has not already been taken by checking this list.

--Orange Mike | Talk 17:16, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nicoontheweb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am an individual and I am not trying to harvest or spam anyone, if my post was not neutral enough, I could easily make it more neutral - I know how passionate you guys all are about maintaining neutrality but maybe this was a bit hasty, I followed a similar formula as a colleague of mine who is also a technical writer - can't you guys give me a chance?? Please

Decline reason:

When you get a warning, it's a good idea to stop and try to understand what the objection is to what you're doing. That way, you can avoid the inevitable block that comes from ignoring warnings. In this case, the problem is that you were creating an article about a person who does not appear to meet the notability criteria. Since that person is yourself, you are also using the encyclopedia for self-promotion. And since you won't stop, and even now seem to want merely to go back to doing the same thing, a block is necessary. But if you ever become interested in what we're doing at Wikipedia- writing an encyclopedia- and want to help us as a personal hobby unrelated to your own business interests, feel free to ask again, with specific details about what kinds of editing you'd like to do. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|Oh, ok. I get it now... I won't try and publish anything about myself, but I'd like to unblock my user name if that's ok?}}

Please tell us what contributions you intend to make if unblocked. Sandstein 05:32, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Sandstein, I think that promise is good enough. What he wrote about himself was that he was a freelance technical writer, so he obviously has the potential to be a good contributor, so long as he doesn't violate WP:COI. Nico: I've unblocked you, contingent on your promise. Just to avoid future trouble, you should read Wikipedia:Conflicts of interest -- basically, not writing about yourself is an important step, but you should also avoid citing your own work, as this too is a conflict of interest. But your expertise and writing are quite welcome, and I hope it works out. Mango juice^talk 14:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Mango juice! First, I am a she not a he. I will not abuse this privilege, and I am 100% committed to contributing good, solid, fact based articles in the areas of broadcast and streaming media. Can someone give me a little guidance -- Where in the Wiki do I put my credentials so that when I do make relevant contributions, fellow editors can site that and there is criteria to my contributions? I don't want to do anything to get myself in trouble again. I don't see anything under MY PREFERENCES. Thank you.

Apologies about the gender thing. You can write about yourself on your user page, User:Nicoontheweb; check out mine for guidance. It's okay to say some stuff about you but don't try to sell anything and don't link to any personal websites at least until you've established yourself as an editor. Also, Wikipedia is not expertise-driven -- in a sense, it doesn't matter if you're an expert or not, your edits are judged on their own substance, and on the sources you cite for verification. Mango juice^talk 16:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RFC on the inclusion of a table comparing SI units and Binary prefixes

Notice: An RFC is being conducted here at Talk:Hard diskdrive#RFC on the use of the IEC prefixes. The debate concerns this table which includes columns comparing SI and Binary prefixes to describe storage capacity. We welcome your input

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Computing --RaptorHunter (talk) 18:50, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]