User talk:Nolan Ryfa

This is Nolan Ryfa's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nolan Ryfa/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Nolan Ryfa/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:27, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mind taking another look? I added a LOT more changes. Nolan Ryfa (talk) 16:03, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nolan Ryfa! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:27, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Nolan Ryfa/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Nolan Ryfa/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:17, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bear's Paw has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bear's Paw. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:25, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bear's Paw Galaxy (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kaleeb18 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 01:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. The record of the review of a draft says not to remove it. That means not to remove it. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 19:05, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Nolan Ryfa, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Theroadislong (talk) 20:28, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question re your draft

Hey there. I noticed the draft you've been working on, and was wondering what the need is for a separately named article to NGC 2537, which already exists? You appear to have replicated the entirety of that article and then added some 'fun facts' below - it might be a better approach to just edit the existing, longstanding article rather than create a duplicate. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:45, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sry about that i rephrased it and added in more information at the bottom. Nolan Ryfa (talk) 07:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bear's Paw Galaxy (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at NGC 2537 instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 06:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bear's Paw Galaxy (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at NGC 2537 instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:49, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:07, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bear's Paw Galaxy (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at NGC 2537. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is an existing page at NGC 2537 and any appropriate content here should be merged into this page. The Bear's Paw Galaxy can then be a redirect to NGC 2537.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 08:19, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft submissions

Hello, Nolan Ryfa,

You are not paying attention to what the draft AFC reviewers are telling you and keep resubmitting the draft over and over again. If you persist, the draft will be rejected and will no longer be eligible to be submitted. Please review their comments and follow their advice, they are very experienced editors and have evaluated hundreds of draft articles.

If you have questions about article creation or Wikipedia policies, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Nolan Ryfa, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:40, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Recreation of page that has been deleted via PROD via cut and paste.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gusfriend (talk) 13:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bear's Paw Galaxy

Why do you insist on creating multiple drafts when there is an existing article - NGC 2537 - to which you could just add the additional information? Nthep (talk) 14:14, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to have my own page Nolan Ryfa (talk) 14:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia isn't a collection of "my pages", it's a collaborative effort, so editors are expected to co-operate and expand on each others work. Nthep (talk) 15:14, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I created for my science teacher, not for a "collaborative effort" Nolan Ryfa (talk) 15:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the case, you should not be editing Wikipedia - collaboration is one of the most important aspects of this encyclopedia. Nobody should own a page. In addition, your most recent efforts include a long copy-and-paste from a book, which is copyright infringing, and also against the rules. (Both here and, I suspect, for your science teacher.) Please take some time to learn how to edit within the guidelines before moving forward with further page creation. Tony Fox (arf!) 15:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Nolan Ryfa! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 17:49, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bear's Paw Galazy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bear's Paw Galazy. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:51, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bear's Paw Galazy

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bear's Paw Galazy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Spelling-error duplicate of Draft:Bear's Paw Galaxy, contains multiple copyright infringements from multiple sources

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tony Fox (arf!) 18:14, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tony Fox kys Nolan Ryfa (talk) 20:22, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion of your edits

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tony Fox (arf!) 18:32, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tony Fox stfunnasty. @ss ugly @ss fatherless ass b1tch Nolan Ryfa (talk) 20:19, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.— rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:29, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you indefinitely as not here to build an encyclopedia. Cullen328 (talk) 20:53, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]