User talk:Nurseledcare

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article National Nursing Centers Consortium has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article was about a real person or group of people, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organized event, but did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is actually significant enough for an encyclopedia article, you are free to re-create it, but this time you need to demonstrate that, which is best done by citing to reliable, secondary sources that are entirely unconnected to the topic.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of National Nursing Centers Consortium

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on National Nursing Centers Consortium, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall ^talk 18:09, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Status and Advice

As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article. There are 3 problems: first, just as you said on the talk p, the article was devoted in large part to explaining how important the organization is. That is exactly what we mean by promotionalism-- it applies to non-profit organization just as much as to corporations. An encyclopedia does not do that: it describes what. an organization is, and what it does. Second, it does this based on references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements. None of the references in the article were of this nature. If an article doe not do more than repeat what would go on an organizations's web p., it is not an encycopedia article.

Third, and most important, you are obviously a contributor with a conflict of interest. Our rules about that are at WP:Conflict of interest. In particular, see our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure. What this means is that you need to do 4 things:

1. make a new account, using a name that represents an individual, but that shows the connection, e.g.. Lou at NCCC . It need not be your real name, but it must be used by only one person.

2. Declare explicitly on that page, and on the talk page of any article with which you have a conflict of interest, that you have such a conflict of interest.

3. If you wish to start an article on the subject, use the WP:Article Wizard. Do not write it in mainspace. The purpose of this is to help you make sure the article will not be considered promotional and consequently be rejected.

4. Any time you wish to add information to any WP article about your organization, or any other group with which you have a COI you must suggest the material on the article talk page, and add a {{Request edit}} notice so it can be evaluated. You may not edit the main article except for uncontroversial updates on matters of fact for which you have reliable sources.

These rules are not optional. To assist that will follow.t you in following them, I must block your present account, as explained in the formal notice below. DGG ( talk ) 00:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 00:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]