User talk:Odeadiawashere

This is Odeadiawashere's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crime Junkie Podcast (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need more than just a mention by Rolling Stone which lists it among seven crime podcasts. That's a good start though.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crime Junkie Podcast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Crime Junkie Podcast, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Odeadiawashere! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crime Junkie Podcast (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

See comments on my talk page for references that should be added before this is approved. Also see how I broke out the format sections and increase coverage for each part.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crime Junkie Podcast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Crime Junkie Podcast, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crime Junkie Podcast has been accepted

Crime Junkie Podcast, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:58, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Edward Dennis Isaac

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Edward Dennis Isaac requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:35, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BLP policy

Hi Odeadiawashere, I saw your note about this on the talk page before I deleted it. Because this is a proposed article about a living person (I assume), you need to make sure that what you write is accurate and well-sourced, and it has to be that way from the first draft you publish. You need to know whether they were charged, convicted, and whether the conviction was overturned, as appropriate. If the person has only been charged, that means it's usually too soon to create a stand-alone article. You have to know the pertinent details in advance of publishing, and use good sources so that you can trust what you're writing. See our policy on living people at WP:BLP, including WP:BLPCRIME. Many thanks, SarahSV ^(talk) 19:24, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Emma Chamberlain

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Emma Chamberlain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:36, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Murder of Laci Peterson

Hi. Thanks for working to improve the Murder of Laci Peterson article with this edit. Can you add a citation of a reliable source to the passage, per WP:Verifiability? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 20:51, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Thanks for letting me know, I added the sources. I hope its acceptable, if not please let me know! Nightscream --via (talk) 00:45, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. One other thing: I'm not sure that the way you signed your message above is the right way to do it, since it shows my username, but not yours, which can be confusing. It's easier if you just type four tildes (~~~~). This not only puts your username at the end of the message, but automatically time stamps it too. Let me know if you ever need anything. :-) Nightscream (talk) 00:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

haha thank you, but I put your username there so it would mention you, though i'm unsure if i did it correctly. i just wanted to make sure you saw my reply :-) anyways thanks again via (talk) 16:31, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Generation Why Podcast

Hello, Odeadiawashere,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nerd1a4i and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, The Generation Why Podcast, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nerd1a4i}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nerd1a4i (talk) 22:43, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 12, 2019 edit-a-thon at "Atla Annual 2019" in Vancouver British Columbia

1000 Women in Religion: A Wikipedia edit-a-thon at "Atla Annual 2019" in Vancouver, British Columbia

The 1000 Women in Religion Project is working to improve the coverage of women’s contributions to religious, spiritual and wisdom traditions worldwide. In support of this goal, the edit-a-thon at Atla's (formerly the American Theological Library Association) annual meeting will focus on improving articles about women in religion. We would love to have a few Vancouver area Wikipedians to help us get new editors oriented and editing!!

Wednesday, June 12, 2019
8:00am-12:00pm
Sheraton Vancouver Wall Centre
1088 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 2R9 Canada

For more details or to sign up, see: Wikipedia edit-a-thon at "Atla Annual Meeting" in Vancouver, British Columbia. For security reasons everyone attending the edit-a-thon must pre-register with Atla here or on our Vancouver Meetup page by May 31st.
For questions, please contact: Dzingle1

Dzingle1 (talk)Dzingle1 (talk) 15:39, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Generation Why Podcast for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Generation Why Podcast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Generation Why Podcast until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ifnord (talk) 17:58, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bryce Laspisa

Hello, Odeadiawashere. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Bryce Laspisa.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:00, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

Thank you for incorporating my userbox into your user-page! Interops (talk) 04:45, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crime Junkie

You mentioned that Ashley Flowers worked at a hospital when she started Crime Junkie. You referenced an article for that entry but that article doesn't say that and actually doesn't mention her place of employment at all. Ashley worked in sales for a software development company when she started Crime Junkie.