User talk:PBnJGuitarist23

Your draft article

I'd strongly advise you to read Wikipedia:Notability (books) before proceeding any further with Draft:Legend of The Thrasher (novel). The book clearly lacks the coverage in secondary sources necessary to meet our notability criteria, and stands no chance of been accepted as an article. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being a dick about it. Very professional. PBnJGuitarist23 (talk) 16:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If wanted to be a dick about it, I'd have kept quiet, and watched you waste more of your time. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:17, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PBnJGuitarist23, if you are going to abuse people who are trying to help you then you are not going to be around here very long. DanielRigal (talk) 21:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Explain my abuse PBnJGuitarist23 (talk) 23:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Matt Walsh (political commentator). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 21:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PBnJGuitarist23! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 21:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn’t vandalism PBnJGuitarist23 (talk) 23:19, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Misinformation is vandalism PBnJGuitarist23 (talk) 23:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He does not oppose LGBT, just trans. As do I. In this country, freedom of speech and beliefs is protected by the constitution, you are being unconstitutional by removing the truth. I can take this higher up if I wish, and will continue to remove misinformation without your influence. PBnJGuitarist23 (talk) 23:23, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before taking anything 'higher', you would do well to find out how Wikipedia actually works. Which doesn't involve using random misinterpretations of constitutional rights to justify imposing your own personal views on others. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:37, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a worldwide project with its own policies, guidelines and behavioral standards. You have no "constitutional rights" on this private website. Read WP:NOTFREESPEECH. Cullen328 (talk) 23:43, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

...And read Wikipedia:Edit warring while you are at it. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dronebogus (talk) 11:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Your screed has been removed and your talk page access has been revoked. As for your donations, please be aware that the Wikimedia Foundation has annual revenues of $155 million and net assets of $240 million. To be frank, they do not need your money. Cullen328 (talk) 03:40, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t forget the completely bogus legal threats against said 240 million dollar organization! Dronebogus (talk) 12:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dronebogus don't do this. They're already blocked, this almost gravedancing, incivil at the least. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 12:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but the legal threat was completely ridiculous. You can’t sue a private organization for violating free speech rights in America, they can censor whatever they want, and WMF isn’t even responsible here. So maybe if they read this they won’t waste their time on a lawsuit. Dronebogus (talk) 12:10, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter how ridiculous it is, Dronebogus. Its none of our business what the user does with their time and money, and they've already been dealt with. Nothing else needs to be said, I'm not sure if you've ever heard the phrase "silence is the best answer to a fool", essentially the core of WP:Do not feed the trolls. Hope this helps. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 21:34, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]