User talk:PalMD

License tagging for Image:Rushsign.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rushsign.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Science-Based Medicine (blog)

A tag has been placed on Science-Based Medicine (blog) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. fr33k man -s- 01:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can I suggest that you put a {{underconstruction}} tag on the page if you want to continue working on it? It's no guarantee that an admin (I' not one) won't delete it, but they may give you a chance. Cheers! :-) fr33k man -s- 02:07, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!PalMD (talk)

Disclosure request

Would you be willing to disclose the contents of your June 2007 email interview with LA Times reporter Stephanie Simon either here or at Rationalwiki, as User:Flippin has done? [1] Thank you. nobs (talk) 22:40, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why should he do that? He's already said that there's no BLP issue, so this solely feeds your personal agenda, not Wikipedia's interests. --69.196.170.188 (talk) 00:00, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the correct response to such a request is "STFU and don't be such a fucking tool." Now get the fuck off of my talk page, idiot.PalMD (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, that needed to be said to nobs. I am sick of all this Conservapedia and such insanity. They blocked me for making a single edit that didn't fall in line. Too factual and "liberally biased" apparently. Cheers! DenaChemistry 05:14, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]