User talk:PaulTapper

This is PaulTapper's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, PaulTapper, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 12:14, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

user:220 of Borg Thanks for the welcome. I am currently seeking advice on how to improve the article in question from other Wikipedians PaulTapper (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NUGEN Audio (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NUGEN Audio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! PaulTapper, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 14:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declare any connection

Hello, PaulTapper. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Draft:NUGEN Audio, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Worldbruce - They have properly declared the COI on their user page. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:38, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Worldbruce Robert McClenon - Thank you for the feedback Worldbruce and Robert. I have tried to comply with the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidance.

Ideally it would not be me creating the article Draft:NUGEN Audio. I did try posting it on Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation but that has a huge back-log.

So - I have tried to draft the article in as neutral a voice as possible (using other similar pages as a guide, eg- IZotope) and made heavy use of independent, published references. I believe the use of references (from many independent paper and e- magazines) demonstrates notability. I am very open to any suggestions on how to improve the article to make it publishable - please help me to improve it. PaulTapper (talk) 08:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:PaulTapper - You probably mean that you requested at Requested articles, and that it has a huge backlog. In fact, I wouldn't even characterize it as having a backlog, because titles build up there for more than a year, and there is no effort to work off the requests. I would characterize it as a black hole. Some volunteer editors will work with special-interest editors, and some won't. I won't. I suggest that you ask for help at the Teahouse or a WikiProject. I am not sure what WikiProject would be able to help you, so I would ask that question at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:48, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon - Yes, sorry, you're right it was Requested articles. Ok, I'll try to find a volunteer editor to help at the Teahouse. Thanks. PaulTapper (talk) 14:07, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:NUGEN Audio has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:NUGEN Audio. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 06:41, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NUGEN Audio (April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Topcipher was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It is rather WP:TOOSOON for the subject of this article to be encyclopedic & besides that, please find some of the other criteria of improvement as below -
1. Statements such as "...Over the next few years..." do not merit encyclopedic content and could also meet conflict of interest.
2. The reference cited towards the disclaimer "..NUGEN Audio opened its New York office.." speaks more about the individual who was hired than the company itself - http://www.4rfv.co.uk/industrynews/175943/nugen_appoints_chief_marketing_officer
3. Kindly refer to what primary, secondary and tertiary sources are to cite better & reliable sources and as mentioned before, please avoid press-releases as far as possible.
4. Reference provided for a claim "...was the first company to release a..." is also extremely questionable -https://issuu.com/newbayeurope/docs/psne_genius_2016 - as the the platform 'allows anyone' to publicize content.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NUGEN Audio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TopCipher (talk) 07:00, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Thanks for the feedback TopCipher PaulTapper (talk) 08:40, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:NUGEN Audio concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:NUGEN Audio, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NUGEN Audio

Hello, PaulTapper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NUGEN Audio".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]