User talk:Pitu093

Welcome!

Hello, Pitu093, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DarjeelingTea (talk) 07:00, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

The page I've been trying to create is deleted due to not be able to put the sourcing/referencing in a proper way, I need help. Please. - NACARID PORTAL ARRAEZ - I am trying to do an essay on my favorite writer and it has to be on wikipedia. So it's part of me to do that. And I've been trying but I need help with the references. Pitu093 (talk) 21:25, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pitu093 (talk) 21:25, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to take a look at WP:Referencing for beginners; the video at that page explains how to easily create nicely-formatted footnotes. A major problem with the deleted page, however, was not the formatting but the quality of the references themselves. Wikipedia content should summarize what reliable third-party sources such as newspapers or reputable magazines have reported about the subject. At most one of the deleted page's external links met that standard and might make a valid reference; that's not enough for a Wikipedia article about Nacarid Portal Arráez. Huon (talk) 22:21, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU SO MUCH!!! I will try and do that, and will let you know. THANK YOU!!!!!! So, basically I have to put in all news paper and news about her that are online and that might hold on to it? Pitu093 (talk) 02:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Andreina PerezPitu093 (talk) 02:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andreinaepa93, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

bonadea contributions talk 05:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My deepest apologies in regards to this manner. I was hacked in the email I used for this account and lost all my passwords. Had to create new e-mail and new accounts on most of my users. Is there any way to fix this? Once again, I am so sorry, it was never my intention to violate Wikipedia's guidelinesPitu093 (talk) 06:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so this new connected account was created in good faith. The rules concerning multiple accounts are there to prevent deceptive editing; I understand that there was no intention to deceive, but creating a new account when two earlier accounts have been blocked, and continuing to create the same pages as before, gives the impression of intentional deception. The best thing to do would have been to ask for Aepa0911 to be unblocked with the information you gave here, instead of just creating yet another account. It would also have been good if you had read the information provided on the talk pages on your previous accounts, about creating new articles. When Nacarid Portal Arráez, Nacarid Portal Arraez and Nacarid Portal were deleted (and I notice that Spanish Wikipedia has protected the title from recreation, following too many repeated creations of the article) it follows that it's not appropriate to simply create the article again, and there is a lot of information over at your old talk pages. I understand that you are a new editor, but then again, you have been creating these articles over and over for several weeks so at some point you'll need to slow down and start reading Wikipedia's guidelines. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 09:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I have read more about the use of wikipedia, and I've tried my best, although I don't seem to be understanding :(. I used the video provided by one of the users, to put the references as it should. I don't know what else to do, please help. Because I feel I don't understand what really says. My deadline is May 15th :( Pitu093 (talk) 15:32, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Love in four seasons

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Love in four seasons, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉ 07:28, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]