User talk:Plimfix
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Autoethnographic Muslim Studies, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.bayyinat.org.uk. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:36, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Autoethnographic Muslim Studies
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Autoethnographic Muslim Studies, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? CIreland (talk) 17:04, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Hourglass
[edit]I've reverted you as it appears there never was such a book. See Ibn Sirin. Dougweller (talk) 10:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- I've reverted you again. Obviously there is a book by that tile, but as his article says, he almost certainly didn't write it. So it isn't a reliable source, see WP:RS, because it can't be verified that he wrote it so we can't date the actual composition of the book. See also [1]. If you still disagree, please don't replace it but ask at WP:RSN if it can be used. Dougweller (talk) 11:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)