User talk:Plwnt

Reliable sources

Hello Plwnt, welcome to Wikipedia. Because information on Wikipedia needs to be WP:verifiable, you need to WP:cite WP:reliable sources in order to add or change information on an article. إيان (talk) 13:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karantika moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Karantika. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 03:24, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karantika

Hey, Plwnt! Your article has been improved and moved back to article space. Thank you for creating it! Valereee (talk) 15:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Caliente (dish)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Caliente (dish), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:06, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Plwnt! I noticed your contributions to Caliente (dish) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Valereee (talk) 11:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Morocco>Algeria

Hey, Plwnt! You've used this source at Caliente (dish) to change "is a savory pie consumed in Morocco" to "is an Algerian pie"; the source calls it Karantika, and it doesn't say that it isn't consumed in Morocco, just that it's popular in Algeria, where "the people claim their version is the best". In the same edit you removed all mention of Gibralter, where it's considered a national dish, along with the reliable source backing that up; removed a citation needed tag; without a source changed paprika to harissa; and in your edit summary said "cultural appropriation". On the talk page you again referenced cultural appropriation and argued that "It's not used in Morocco you can check they only knew about it in 2019 and still don't know how to make it properly, there's no debate about it, it's Algerian street food" and "there's not a single original old moroccan source", which of course is not possible to know. At Karantika, you've been making unsourced or poorly sourced additions and have removed mention that it similar dishes are known in other mediterranean countries. This feels very much like you have a non-neutral point of view on this food item.

You need to discuss these things at the talk page. Valereee (talk) 11:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are just giving more reasons for cultural appropriation, the book talks about Maghreb food , if it existed they would've mentioned it, instead I brought many sources that says it is Algerian yet all I saw is new moroccan sources (2019/2023) that are made by Moroccan websites, we consume pizza in all over the World that doesn't make it a national traditional dish Plwnt (talk) 12:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to assume good faith; it's required here per WP:AGF.

It doesn't really matter that you believe this to be cultural appropriation, we still need reliable sources for changes, additions, etc. And we need reasons to remove sourced content, and other editors have to agree with those reasons. Please start using edit summaries and rather than edit-warring, discuss changes you believe should be made on the articles' talk pages. Valereee (talk) 17:12, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my belief it is a fact but whatever people now know that Wikipedia ain't a reliable source and nothing else but this page can be found about it being moroccan so good luck with your cultural appropriation Plwnt (talk) 20:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Riad (architecture). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 16:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At this point wikipedia is controlled by lies, where's the administration from the fake historical lies that are being spread on this site, and why does it benefit some groups who are using nothing but their fake articles and try to hide and delete the edits that uses historical books? Plwnt (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]