User talk:Poirsn

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Njuk (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Acalamari. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by this? Acalamari 21:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To my knowledge, I have not removed anything of yours. I don't know what you mean. Acalamari 21:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Flowerpotman, you will be blocked from editing. Acalamari 21:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppet

Based on edit history, I'm tagging this account as a probable sock puppet of banned User:Njuk. Any further vandalism will result in immediate block. Michaelbusch (talk) 21:45, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This account will be blocked within the next ten minutes. Should you create additional accounts and continue your rampant vandalism, they will also be blocked. Please find a better outlet for your zeal. Michaelbusch (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Glen Ellyn, Illinois, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Glen Ellyn, Illinois was changed by Poirsn (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-12-12T21:55:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Your recent edit to User:Michaelbusch (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 21:57, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Michaelbusch, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alf ^melmac 21:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]