User talk:Pojpedrosa

Concern regarding Draft:Gaia Education

Hello, Pojpedrosa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gaia Education, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

You declared a conflict of interest, what is the nature of it? 331dot (talk) 12:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am the CEO of Gaia Education Pojpedrosa (talk) 12:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you are compensated for being the CEO, you must make the stricter paid editing disclosure, a Terms of Use requirement.

I will note that if you were to submit your draft now, it would be declined quickly. It is almost exclusively sourced to your company website. Wikipedia is not a place for companies to tell the world about themselves and what they do- that is considered promotional here. A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. Please read Your First Article. If you intend to proceed with this- which is inadvisable, but you may- you will need to radically change your approach, and first gather independent reliable sources that chose on their own to discuss your company and what they see as significant/important/influential about it. This should not include brief mentions, your own website, press releases, announcements of routine activities, and the like. 331dot (talk) 12:14, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will work on it, and put more external references. That is just a reference for now, before I publish it we will mainly use independent realiable sources.

About the sticker will also do that. Pojpedrosa (talk) 12:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for disclosing. My advice is that you essentially start over and blank your draft to start fresh, and first get the independent reliable sources, then summarize them, before adding any information from your company. 331dot (talk) 12:52, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would also highly advise you to read WP:BOSS. 331dot (talk) 12:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will add some things can be sourced to your company website, like number of employees, location, things about it- but that does not establish notability. 331dot (talk) 12:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Images

I removed the logo from the draft. You uploaded it to Commons and claimed it as your own personal work- this was improper. Company logos cannot be on Commons as Commons only hosts "free" images where the copyright is released to be compatible with Wikipedia(which means that it can be reused for any purpose, including commerical, with attribution). This means that you made the company logo available for anyone to use and sell as long as they say they got it from Wikipedia and your company would not be entitled to any money from the sale of its own logo. Company logos must be uploaded to this Wikipedia directly(see WP:UPIMAGE) and claimed as "fair use", not your own personal work.

Logos also cannot be in drafts(due to "fair use" limitations) until the draft is accepted and placed in the encyclopedia. Images are not relevant to the draft approval process anyway, which only considers the text and sources. You don't need to worry about the logo until the draft is accepted. 331dot (talk) 09:24, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh nice info... Thank you so much. Pojpedrosa (talk) 10:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaia Education (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gaia Education and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 11:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pojpedrosa! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 11:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gaia Education

Hello, Pojpedrosa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gaia Education".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]