User talk:Puldin
Report
[edit]I reported you here [1] They will probably redirect me somewhere, but this is a start. PajaBG (talk) 18:20, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Church of Saint Sava. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 18:22, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
C.Fred
[edit]Hello. I have not break any rule. I have never edit one page more than one time per day. Why you warned me about that? As for my edits in the respective article. I explained several times but the other editore just ignor the explanations and repeat one thing. I can prove that I am right and I can give you citations and sources of information about this issue if you want.
- Just because you didn't break the three revert rule doesn't mean you aren't edit warring. I see that you made three reverts to Church of Saint Sava within a 24-hour period, from 14:07 4 Oct to 12:18 5 Oct (UTC): [2] [3] [4], which goes against your claim of never more than one edit per day.
- Edit warring has nothing to do with being right or wrong. It has to do with refusing to discuss the matter on the article's talk page. I see no edits in your edit history to Talk:Church of Saint Sava. I strongly suggest you start discussion there if you think there are changes that need to be made. —C.Fred (talk) 00:19, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the answer. As I said I am freshman in Wikipedia. I did not know that I should use the form that you showed me above. And even now I am not sure how to use it. As for my claim - in the lines above I did not express myself in the proper way but even in this case I have not break the respective rule. I believe that I have never break any rule. And I am warned about it in the same time. I can not understand that. As for the edit warring. There are two sides in this. It is not only me in this. Right? But I am the only one who is warned. Why is that? Thank you for your advice. I will explore the form that you showed me in the lines above and I will try to use it. But what should I do if the other editor continue to not accept the facts and deny reliable sources?
Thank you for the answer
[edit]Thank you for the answer. As I said I am freshman in Wikipedia. I did not know that I should use the form that you showed me above. And even now I am not sure how to use it. As for my claim - in the lines above I did not express myself in the proper way but even in this case I have not break the respective rule. I believe that I have never break any rule. And I am warned about it in the same time. I can not understand that. As for the edit warring. There are two sides in this. It is not only me in this. Right? But I am the only one who is warned. Why is that? Thank you for your advice. I will explore the form that you showed me in the lines above and I will try to use it. But what should I do if the other editor continue to not accept the facts and deny reliable sources?
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for January 21
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of tallest church buildings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wooden church. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
CS1 error on List of tallest church buildings
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of tallest church buildings, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)