User talk:Rahga

This is Rahga's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Reverting redirects

If you are going to revert redirects, give a good reason to. Don't tell me to assume opposition to it. - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:30, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't use redirects in place of a request for deletion, especially when usable content is involved. Don't assume that some vague guidelines you've fabricated ("guide content") are valid reasons for removing content. But mostly, you are redirecting stuff when you should be requesting a delete or at the very least going to the talk page. In particular, you are breaking links all over the Nintendo DS content with no regard to what articles link to other nor why the content exists in the first place. Rahga 15:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful logic. Sure, AfD is not for redirects, but I should propose a redirect there anyway. Do you have an argument besides "if there could theoretically be controversy in your edits, ask permission"? - A Link to the Past (talk) 19:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Nintendo DS downloadable games

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Nintendo DS downloadable games, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nintendo DS downloadable games. Thank you. hbdragon88 02:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bush Doctrine

Hi, sorry I reverted your addition as Palin's apparent confusion does not further the understanding of the article topic itself. In my opinion, it really belongs on a campaign article or at Palin's article. There is an ongoing discussion at [1]. Please come by and discuss. thank you and regards, --guyzero | talk 19:51, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and I understand your point. Your entry is the best of the bunch and properly sourced to boot. Unfortunately most of the "discussion" around these entries is occurring in edit summaries with no consensus yet found on the talkpage. Perhaps you can reference your edit onto the talkpage and see what others think? best regards and thanks again, --guyzero | talk 20:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]