User talk:Raiders88

Please proselytise your CADASIL 'discoveries' elsewhere.

First of all, your comments are highly inappropriate with the words proselytize. Only a complete tool like yourself would interpret my additions as attempting in any way to sway opinion or convert. I never even heard of CADASIL till I read that, nor claim I "Discovered" anything, Columbus. Do whatever the hell you want with that article, so long as you don't bother me and act superior.. Unless you try growing a spine to dare say it to my face. Pompous loser.

Concern regarding Draft:Central Sensitization

Hello, Raiders88. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Central Sensitization, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:30, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Raiders88! Your additions to Draft:Central Sensitization have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:53, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You lame not! You’re the one who sabotaged my article. I had to rewrite it but was saving the advanced text later. It is still very much in progress. And nobody else is helping but someone has to do it. Raiders88 (talk) 04:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add copyright content to Wikipedia, not even temporarily for editing. Please do your amendments before you save the page, or use an external editor such as Microsoft Word or Google Docs and work on it there until you are sure it's completely original. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 12:35, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know how yet on mobile. I would’ve preferred obviously not to publish it yet. But at the very least leave quotes. Anyways my apologies. I thought you were a bot, Raiders88 (talk) 18:41, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because the same set of warnings are used repeatedly, we use templates a lot, which gives the illusion of bot. — Diannaa (talk) 00:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Central Sensitization

Hello, Raiders88. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Central Sensitization".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]