User talk:Railtrailssuck

October 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of youngest killers. Sundayclose (talk) 18:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Murder of David Dorn. Clean up the grammar and violation of WP:SURNAME. Otherwise the edit will be reverted. Sundayclose (talk) 18:57, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with it it looks fine to me? and this one has it cited in the sources too. So if you think it is not good how can it be better? Railtrailssuck (talk) 19:09, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you actually READ WP:SURNAME??? No, you did not. Don't ask people for help if you're not willing to put in a little effort to learn about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. It's not my responsibility to make your edits for you. Ask someone who understands English grammar to help you. Competence in English is required to edit the English Wikipedia.. If you can't fix it in the next 24 hours I'm reverting it.

And Cadeken, if you continue to edit, or if you deny that you are Cadeken, there will be an immediate sockpuppet investigation. Sundayclose (talk) 19:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of school shootings in the United States (2000–present). Sundayclose (talk) 03:26, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cadeken, do you think I'm not serious about a sockpuppet investigation? One more edit and I'm going straight to SPI. Sundayclose (talk) 03:27, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Stockton serial killings, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 15:31, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cadeken

Other editors, please see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Cadeken/Archive to see the identical editing pattern. Sundayclose (talk) 19:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Sundayclose I have been doing some digging on you and apparently your history is not the best either do you remember when User:Ivanvector said "Did you even look at the sources in these edits, or are you just indiscriminately reverting a new user and flooding their talk page with inappropriate warnings?" on your talk page? because it seems you just did that again.--Railtrailssuck (talk) 19:29, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the threats, Cadeken. I'm very, very close to requesting a sock puppet investigation. You have damaged Wikipedia countless times, and it's time for you to stop socking. Again, if you deny that you're Cadeken, I'll proceed with the SPI. Sundayclose (talk) 19:32, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Cadeken per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cadeken. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:48, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]