User talk:Rao Ravindra

Welcome!

This user comes from India.

This user is a participant in WikiProject Indian railways.

This user is member of WikiProject Indian roads

Hello, Rao Ravindra, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please change picture

An Invite to join the WikiProject Railways in India

- - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Railways in India- - - - - - - - - - - -
File:Goldenchariot train luxury service in india.jpg
Hi, Rao Ravindra, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Indian Railways ! The WikiProject Indian Railways in India is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, Railways in India and Wikiprojects, to do with anything related to Railways in India.
As you have shown an interest in article related to Railways in India we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.Thank you for your contributions.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

naveenpf (talk) 03:10, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Rao Ravindra,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

An Invite to join the WikiProject Indian Roads

- - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Indian Roads - - - - - - - - - - - -

Hi, Rao Ravindra, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Indian Roads ! The WikiProject Indian Roads is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, road portal and Wikiprojects, to do with anything related to Indian Roads.
As you have shown an interest in article related to Indian roads we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.Thank you for your contributions.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

naveenpf (talk) 12:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Rao, for joining WP:INR and WP:INRI; your ideas will be really helpful for growing this project --naveenpf (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adding links

Or Diffs. The easy way if you wish to link to something another editor has said is the following. Click on page history, find the user whose edit you wish to link to. As an example I will use myself[1] That link is my contribution history. See where it says "19:35, 15 August 2012 (diff | hist)" That was my last edit before this one. Click on diff, then copy the URL. Go to the talk page were you wish to use this diff. Paste the link between these []. You now have a link to a diff. You will need to do this exact procedure should you ever report an editwar btw, so practice a little. Facts, not fiction (talk) 19:49, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Thank you for your contributions to Siliguri. You changed the population data, mentioning the recent census. Please add a citation to support your changes. ThanksSpan (talk) 11:16, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Added correct area of the city and details of population, literacy, sex ratio, etc. with 4 citations of official websites. Rao Ravindra (talk) 18:40, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Span (talk) 19:12, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For improving Indian railway stations Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KMP Expressway

To add junctions, add the following code " |junction= " in the infobox. You can see Kalyani Expressway for usage. Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 11:46, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Citations for Sambhaji

Thanks for your help cleaning up Sambhaji and preventing the IPs from turning into a hagiography of a mythic figure rather than a proper biography. I notice you added a few points, but do you have any citations you can add to those? The article is rather under-cited, and adding more references would make it easier to keep the POV-warriors from interfering with it. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:09, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bhagat Singh

Please accept my apologies for reverting you at Bhagat Singh. I've now reinstated your stuff. I had a complete brain fart there. - Sitush (talk) 08:39, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jasidih–Dumka–Rampurhat railway line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Banka. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited S M Zaheer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hum Log. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Portuguese India, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Diu and Daman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jamnagar & Dwarka Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saurashtra. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prakash Vir Shastri Avenue for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prakash Vir Shastri Avenue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Vir Shastri Avenue (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 18:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rao Ravindra. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

symbol

Do check your edits 1 and 2 on Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation, where you stated "Symbol for rupee - Hindi symbol does not appear in English edition of Wikipedia". For your information currency symbols are not language based and the symbol "₹" is the symbol of the Indian rupee since 2011. Do check you edit from the next, think and understand before. Thank you. Hydloc009 (talk) 20:10, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Rabindranath Tagore

Hello, I'm DarkSpartan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rabindranath Tagore have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I don't believe that it was a mistake on my part.I was the one who put the "British Indian" nationality as to make that article more accurate and Neutral. British India dissolved in 1947 and Rabindranath died in 1941. That means he died before India EVER came into being. Keep that in mind before engaging in an edit war with me. And I also noticed that you have a history of edit wars. (NOTE: DON'T REVERT MY EDITS OR ELSE IT WILL BE COUNTED AS AN EDIT WARRING BEHAVIOR.) DarkSpartan (talk) 20:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your communication with DarkSpartan

Hi Rao Ravindra! Happy Friday! I hope you're having a great start to the weekend :-). I just wanted to reach out to you and express concerns with some of the statements you made towards DarkSpartan recently. It appears that you two are engaged in a discussion over a dispute regarding World History and ethnicity, but some of the statements you made in response here and here - were not acceptable or appropriate, namely when you say to this user, "Did you go to school and learn elementary history or are you so bigoted and ignorant from early childhood?", "Wake up, DarkSpartan. Give up your prejudices, read history and learn to become objective", "Don't tell me ever again not to edit", and "Make some effort to educate yourself" - are uncivil and make personal attacks at DarkSpartan. You call him "bigoted", you call him "ignorant", you call him someone who has the knowledge of a child. You tell him to give up his "prejudices", and you conclude by telling him in a snippy tone to read some history books so he can become "objective", or knowledgeable. These are personal attacks and aren't okay to make towards others. I urge you to evaluate the things you say toward other editors while in a dispute or discussion, and understand that quality arguments and statements are what we look for when deciding consensus; personal attacks and jabs like this do not build quality arguments - they destroy them. I hope you understand the reason behind my message and that you take a few minutes to reflect on this, and let me know if you have any questions or need any input or help from me - I'll be happy to help you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rao Ravindra. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rao Ravindra. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Your addition to Sheikh Abdullah has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you write the deleted paragraph here yourself? Your bombastic edit summary implies that you see nothing wrong in your actions. I am pinging Diannaa to see if she would like to look into this. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:13, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't appear to be a copyright violation. The source appears to be this article. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the deleted paragraph.

Sheikh Abdullah came to Delhi and was staying in Nehru's residence when the-then Prime Minister of Jammu & Kashmir, Mehr Chand Mahajan was meeting with Nehru and Sardar Patel on 26 October 1947 to persuade Nehru to send the air force immediately to Srinagar but Nehru was undecided. Mahajan threatened to leave but Sardar Patel asked him to stay. Sheikh Abdullah overheard the heated argument in the next room and sent a note to Nehru stating that he agreed with Mahajan. After seeing Abdullah's note, Nehru agreed to send the air force immediately (Extract from Mahajan’s autobiography ‘Looking Back’ published in 1963). Thus Abdullah's note saved Srinagar and Kashmir. Abdullah wanted to head a civilian government in the state and was totally against Jinnah and opposed to the idea of Kashmir’s accession to Pakistan.

The last sentence is what caught my attention, which is lifted from here verbatim. The sentence before it is a close paraphrase of the headline. Let us assume that the rest of the paragraph is a paraphrase of the source. But where is the citation? If you are claiming that Mahajan is your source, then you must have read the book. Have you? And, what is "extract" supposed to mean? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Annual reminder of discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 12:57, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello, I'm Tamravidhir. I noticed that you recently removed content from Red Fort without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tamravidhir (talk) 08:51, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mehrauli, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Tamravidhir (talk) 17:16, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions reminder

You have already received an ARBIPA sanctions reminder in the last 12 months. So, the kinds of edits reverted here, without edit summaries or pointless summaries on a Kashmir conflict-related article are quite inexplicable. If you continue in this way, I will have to bring it to admins' attention. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:44, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Article 370 of the Constitution of India, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:04, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 23:52, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Harshil169. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. This edit is vandalism. Harshil ^{want to talk?} 00:40, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

edit war

Please read wp:brd and wp:editwar, if you make a change and it is undone make a case at talk and get consensus for it. Also "Pakistan, ... said", we do not take one side if a dispute claims as statements of fact.Slatersteven (talk) 12:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reverted make a case at talk.Slatersteven (talk) 12:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2019 Balakot airstrike have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please also note you are engaging in an edit war. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 13:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 13:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

In Wikipedia distances are typically expressed using an appropriate "primary unit", displayed first, followed, when appropriate, by a conversion in parentheses e.g. 200 kilometres (120 mi). See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Please do not remove conversion templates that provide a conversion between metric and non-metric distances.-- Toddy1 (talk) 03:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Delhi Sarai Rohilla

A tag has been placed on Template:Delhi Sarai Rohilla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it duplicates information in Template:Delhi Sarai Rohilla 2 (formerly criteria T3)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 16:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Delhi Sarai Rohilla

Template:Delhi Sarai Rohilla has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 04:11, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Tawang seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Your edit to Baramulla has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]