User talk:Reasonable Actor

October 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bishonen | talk 05:27, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reasonable Actor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet of Rameezraja001. I have never heard of this person. Where is your evidence I am him? Reasonable Actor (talk) 15:03, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The evidence is at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rameezraja001. Yamla (talk) 15:22, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note from blocking admin: WP:DUCK. When the editor you have never heard of was blocked, by what strange coincidence did you step smoothly into his shoes in this dialogue and begin to imitate the way he talks? Bishonen | talk 15:20, 6 October 2018 (UTC).[reply]

LMAO. It's a parody of his sophistry. You didn't get that? Reasonable Actor (talk) 17:08, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]