User talk:Regmikris

October 2020

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to List of romance anime. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 12:20, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 02:49, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

I understand I made a mistake the first two times I made changes to the Wikipedia pages. I shouldn't have had done that but the third time I placed my link, that wasn't inappropriate at all. I respect what you might have thought before making that decision. But see this time, I placed a new link with a perfectly written article on the same topic as the Wiki Pages was about. Additionally, I didn't add my link in a spammy though I do understand I might not be a trustable source. But what I want to tell in my defense is that I edited and added a new external link because the existing link wasn't working. Seems the server was down I used that opportunity to place my link and make that fruitful. I still don't understand why you keep placing the previous edits back even though the page doesn't load. Also, the very first link placed is also irrelevant at least for me. But the link I placed was completely relevant and appropriate too. I still don't understand why it was labeled inappropriate.

Will I get a reply here? Regmikris (talk) 09:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Adding 'your link' is inappropriate whether you add it as a new link or find some dead link to replace. Dead links are not an 'opportunity' for you to promote your web site. - MrOllie (talk) 12:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

So you decide to keep a non-working site? On top of that, there's also a totally irrelevant link and you approve that? See the second time edited and placed the URL about Romance Anime list it was totally relevant and you still decide to remove it and place some non-working and irrelevant link? If it's because of something I did in the past, I regret that. You said, "Adding 'your link' is inappropriate whether you add it as a new link or find some dead link to replace." I totally agree with you here. Why are there still inappropriate and not-working external links when you have removed mine? I don't want to argue much but if you see me as an untrustable source, I accept that because my site is quite very very less popular. You said dead links are not an 'opportunity' for me to promote your web site, isn't it ours work to keep the page fresh? Not to argue more, I seek for your reply and quit. Thank you MrOllie. - Regmikris (talk)

This is my new reply. Sorry for my ignorance and stupidity. I just asked out in Quora related to this thing and now I'm aware why I am wrong. I do still expect a reply. And I'm really sorry caused disruptive edits. Regmikris (talk)