User talk:Rehmanmd

Welcome!

Hello, Rehmanmd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Emedicalpoint - Doctors, Health & Medical Web Portal, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Anthem of joy (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Emedicalpoint - Doctors, Health & Medical Web Portal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Emedicalpoint - Doctors, Health & Medical Web Portal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Anthem of joy (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Hello Rehmanmd. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Anthem of joy (talk) 13:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Emedicalpoint - Doctors, Health & Medical Web Portal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Emedicalpoint - Doctors, Health & Medical Web Portal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. noq (talk) 18:45, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The second post was deleted because it was not an article but a request for assistance, more or less like User:Rehmanmd/Emedicalpoint - Doctors, Health & Medical Web Portal which is a good place to develop a draft although one finished it should likely be named Emedicalpoint. Meanwhile there is no need to keep editors on this board here updated. Rather check out the links on your page, maybe do some small edits elsewhere and feel your way around. There is no deadline.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:53, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is good advice at WP:Your first article and the WP:FAQ/Organizations. It will save you time in the end to read them both carefully. Important things to understand are:

If the organization is to have an article, you need to show Notability, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."
Your first version was copied from here. You must not copy information into Wikipedia unless a formal copyright release has been made, as described at WP:DCM.
But that would be a waste of time, because that material is far too promotional, and is obviously written for EMedical point: "Our vision is clear... We are constantly trying... " and uses unsupported "peacock terms" like "user friendly, high quality and cost effective... " Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a notice-board, and is not for promotion of any kind; anything that reads like an advertisement will be speedily deleted, as your first version was. An encyclopedia article is a quite different thing from an organisation's own website, or an advertisement: it requires a WP:Neutral point of view, and should not be written as by the organisation about itself, but as from outside, giving a neutral description of what it does, plain facts supported by references. Wikipedia's WP:Verifiability policy requires that "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source".

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:19, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Emedicalpoint

If Emedicalpoint is to have an article, you have two main obstacles to overcome:

Notability. This is Wikipedia's term for the way it decides what subjects are suitable for articles, and it is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people unconnected with the subject thought it important and significant enough to write substantial comment about? If not, it cannot have an article.

Your article had a list of references, but the only one that mentioned Emedicalpoint was its own website.

Promotion. Your article was written in a promotional tone, using the first person, "Our vision is clear... we will try to make a bridge... You can participate with us... We are constantly trying... We are committed to improve the portal... " It was a message from the organisation to promote itself to potential users. An encyclopedia article is quite different: it should be a neutral description, written as if from outside, no opinions, just plain facts backed up by reliable sources.

The article title has been salted - protected from creation - because you posted it several times. What you should do is:

Think hard about whether you can demonstrate notability, because if not you will be wasting your time
If you want to go ahead, read WP:Your first article carefully
Make a draft article in your user space - start by going to Help:Userspace draft. Be very careful that it does not sound as if it is written by Emedicalpoint or is trying to promote it.
Approach user Jimfbleak (talk), the admin who protected the title, for permission to post it.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:34, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I would like to edit health and medical related page in Bangladesh Rehmanmd 20:00, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Online Health Treatment & Doctors in Bangladesh.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 07:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re your comment on my Talk page. You need to improve your article quickly, in particular provide reliable sources (in news articles, books etc.) to show 'Online health treatment in Bangladesh' is a notable, widely talked about subject. Bear in mind, you have already been advised to be careful about your conflict of interest. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform to promote your website. Kind regards. Sionk (talk) 23:09, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Online health treatment and doctors in bangladesh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Online health treatment and doctors in bangladesh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Online health treatment and doctors in bangladesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 20:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Online Health Treatment & Doctors in Bangladesh concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Online Health Treatment & Doctors in Bangladesh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:54, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Online Health Treatment & Doctors in Bangladesh

Hello Rehmanmd. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Online Health Treatment & Doctors in Bangladesh.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Online Health Treatment & Doctors in Bangladesh}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 02:18, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]