User talk:Ridwanlikeshorses

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Ridwan Haq‎ (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(see: block log • contributions • deleted contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)

A tag has been placed on Ridwan haq requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. FamicomJL 23:14, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ridwan Haq, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JForget 23:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Michellecrisp, you will be blocked from editing. Oxymoron⁸³ 23:29, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Michellecrisp, you will be blocked from editing. Oxymoron⁸³ 23:33, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Michellecrisp, you will be blocked from editing. — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim}^dagnabbit!) 01:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, so it has been blocked indefinitely. NawlinWiki 01:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ridwanlikeshorses (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Last edit was justified. User Michellecrisp was in obvious violation of the Three Revert Rule.

Decline reason:

Be that as it may, you were completely out of line in vandalising her userpage and ignoring repeated warnings. Not even gonna get into how fascinating it is that a brand new user knows about 3RR. Declining to unblock. ~ Riana ⁂ 01:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.