User talk:Rizky Iconia

Getting started

My test area

Get help

Inbox

Welcome to Wikipedia.

Thanks for creating a Wikipedia account, Rizky Iconia. Now you're a part of the world's largest encyclopedia. Happy editing!

Tell us more about yourself This page is your user page. You are free to change it however and whenever you want. Just remember, it is your face towards the rest of the community and the world. You can always get back here by clicking on your user name at the very top of every page.

Start editing Every one of Wikipedia's articles has been created by its readers. Click here to learn more about how quickly and easily you can help make Wikipedia better. As we say: Be bold!

Personalize Wikipedia With your account, you can enhance your reading and editing experience by marking articles to watch as they evolve and adjusting your settings.

About me

Click here to add an image of yourself (optional).
Important information for minors

Welcome!

Hello, Rizky Iconia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! SamanthaPuckettIndo (talk) 06:12, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chelsea F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zinedine Zidane may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 3 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

realmadrid.com/cs/Satellite/es/1193040967842/1330021868266/jugador/Jugador/Theo.htm|title=Portada > Plantilla > Otras Categorías > Benjamín B|accessdate=12 January 2008|language=Spanish|publisher=RealMadrid.com |archiveurl = http:
ar|زين الدين يزيد زيدان}}, [[Arabic transliteration|transliteration]]: ''Zayn-u-Dīn Yazīd Zaydān'').

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:29, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retired numbers

Hi there. Do you have a source for Zola's #25 being retired at Chelsea? This has come up before and the conclusion was that it has not been retired officially. Thanks. SteveO (talk) 14:05, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox photos

Hi, I noticed that you've edited a lot of football player articles and replaced their infobox photos, often with blurry, wider shots. Please keep in mind that the point of infobox pictures is to show what the players look like, not necessarily show the latest photos. Tighter, portrait shots are better for this purpose. Thanks. Mosmof (talk) 14:52, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Josep Maria Bartomeu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2013–14 FC Bayern Munich season, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:59, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Redknapp

I changed his trophies section as he did not win all them cups but you undid the changes without even clicking on the links provided to see that for all of them games he was not in the starting XI or even on the bench

dont be so quick to undo stuff without checking it

@the_gfp

fellow arsenal fan

August 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2014–15 Chelsea F.C. season. You have been warned many times in the past. NO LOGOS!!!!! QED237 (talk) 10:42, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently editing against consensus, policies, and guidelines, with no sign of taking any notice of messages about your editing. You have done this in a number of ways, including repeatedly adding versions of football kits which include logos, despite having received quite a number of messages explaining that doing so is unacceptable, over a period of almost six months. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and works by different editors cooperating, and discussing any disagreements they may have with a view to trying to reach agreement, not by individual editors ignoring what anyone else says, and pressing on with their own chosen version. When your block comes to an end, please be prepared to take part in discussions if you think there are good reasons for edits you made which others have disagreed with, and do not make edits which you know full well are against consensus. So far, the only edits you have ever made to any talk page are periodically removing messages from this page, without replying to them or showing any sign of taking notice of them. Considering the extent of your persistent editing out of line with Wikipedia's standards, despite having the problems explained to you, it is surprising that you were not blocked long ago. For now, this block is for just a week, and even that can be shortened if you can persuade an administrator that you have taken this message on board and will not continue in the same way. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:26, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Paris Saint-Germain F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. LRD NO (talk) 23:27, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When this account was blocked for a while, the hope was that the block would make you take note of the messages about your editing, and that you would respond, make it clear that in future you would edit within Wikipedia's accepted standards, and start responding to messages. However, you have made no response at all, and have continued editing in exactly the same way as before. Your account has therefore been blocked again, this time for a month. I have given you information above about what to do if you wish to be unblocked. Since much of your editing is constructive, it would be a pity to lose you as an editor, so I do hope this time you will take note of what you have been told. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:01, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kit shorts CFC 03 05 White.png

The file File:Kit shorts CFC 03 05 White.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]