User talk:RmahHN
RmahHN, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]Hi RmahHN! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
RmahHN (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not, and never was a sockpuppet for HN4131741 or anyone else. I don't know why these accusations were made against me. From the day I opened this account I never used any other accounts. Before I opened this account I made some changes to pages with my IP visible. Other than that I never used multiple names or anything of the sort. HN4131741 vandalized pages. I made corrections, never making fun of people or adding nasty remarks. What I did do was make sure that people weren't taking credit for things done by other people. Unfortunately Rabbi Horowitz is not a member of the "Moetzes". There was a meeting today and he once again was not there, Nor was he by the previous meeting. Bringing a picture and newspaper articles from one meeting which he was only there for the first half, after which he was removed with force is far from telling the truth. See pictures from today's meeting and you will see he was not there. I hope you will be satisfied with my reply and reopen my account immediately. Thank you
Decline reason:
In consultation with the blocking administrator, I am convinced that there are enough behavioural traits that make it clear that you are most likely a sock. Although socking is the primary reason for your block and my decision to not unblock, I also have secondary concerns about your obvious conflict of interest editing here. Singularity42 (talk) 15:03, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.