User talk:Ro0103

commons:Category:Military OrBat Graphics/Croatia - Done :-) but you need to help me with some minor issues:

General Staff:

1) is it in Zagreb? or somewhere else?

2) are there more General Staff units besides the Guard Btn. & the Special Ops Btn.?

Navy:

1) Where are the 1st and 2nd Coast Guard Divisions stationed?

2) Where are the Marine Infantry Regiment, Coastal Surveillance Battalion & Navy Training Center based?

3) Are the 2x Naval Detachments based in Split?

Air Force:

1) Where are the Air Surveillance Battalion & the Air Force Training Center?

in the Military of Croatia article it says: "Support/Logistics/Special Forces and HQ:2,000" = do you knwo if there are any Support or Logistic units that are missing?

thanks, that are all the questions I have and if you do not know the answers, I will leave the graphics unchanged - if you have some answers or some more information, let me know; I can update the graphic now within minutes :-) --noclador (talk) 15:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS: are the stars for the three commands correct??? 3x stars for Army Commander and 2x stars each for Navy Commander and Air Force Commander? --noclador (talk) 15:57, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Answers

the changes I made are:

1) ELINT Center added

2) Coast Guard 1st division in Split and 2nd in Pula

3) Marine Infantry Regiment I put into Ploče - if/when that changes let me know and I will quickly correct it; I added the Marine Btn.! if there are more units within the Marine Rgt. let me know and I will add them too. Coastal Surveillance Battalion & Navy Training Center are now both in Split

4) Detachment North is in Pula, and South I put at Ploče

5) Air Force Training Center is in Zadar

6) Support Command and Croatian Military Academy: If both have battalions or companies under command we should add them - especially Support Command seems important to me. So, yes please give me the schemes of this two units and I will see if/what should be added :-)

thanks, for your help --noclador (talk) 07:36, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

added training center names
fixed marine btn.
i would leave the brigades units names in Croatian - I have not translated unit honor names for the other army graphics, because I think this is an important of a countries military history and traditions and should stay in their language (like: we would also not translate a persons name)
added the Support command (the locations of the units are still missing!)
i did not add the entire Military Academy - i added only a square for it directly under General Staff

Could you please check if the graphics are now correct; or if any other changes are needed? thanks :-) --noclador (talk) 09:36, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

changed the Special operations Btn. just now; as for Mil. Int. Btn: is really Special Forces? operating Elint and UAV doesn't sound like SF (there is an agreement by editors of the Military history project that only the very best SF units get the SF symbol and color (i.e. KSK, Delta Force - i.e. the 175th US Ranger Regiment did not qualify for SF and is only classed on wikipedia as a SOF- Special Operations Force; another example of the 3 Italian Army Special units only the 9th "Col Moschin" is designated SF - the 4th Alpini and the 185 R.A.O. are both classed as SOF units, although the training of the three units is almost identical. --noclador (talk) 09:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just now changed the Mil. Int. Btn. symbol from UAV and the color from "signal unit" color to "SOF Reconnaissance unit" symbol and the SF units color. as the Mil. Int. Btn. is not a pure SF unit (ELINT and UAV) I think this symbol should do. --noclador (talk) 15:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Armoured Guard Brigade

done (as symbol I used the new USA symbol for Combined-arms maneuver battalions) and: thanks for the info :-) --noclador (talk) 12:27, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Croatian Coast Guard

Hi, I've seen your edit about the new inisgna and "racing stripes" of the CCG. Do the Lučke kapetanije change their own racing stripes or not? Thank you in advance! --Nicola Romani (talk) 19:05, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:27, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox picture

Discuss about infobox picture of article "Croats" here.--Wustefuchs (talk) 11:50, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.S Philbrick (Talk) 14:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Old parish house "Crkvenjak"

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Old parish house "Crkvenjak" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.svetanedelja.hr/en/crkvenjak-the-parish-house-po64. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:17, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]