User talk:RockyTheFox

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Laura Prepon, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! BlackcurrantTea (talk) 06:42, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of adult animated films has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of adult animated films was changed by RockyTheFox (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892781 on 2020-08-13T03:08:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:08, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Happy Madison Productions, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 03:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ionmars10. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on TheOdd1sOut, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Ionmars10 (talk) 22:59, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Splash (film), you may be blocked from editing. Touchstone is not a distribution label. It's a releasing label. There a huge difference. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:59, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Who Framed Roger Rabbit. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Iron Giant. Altering the text of a quotation is not really acceptable. But it's completely unacceptable to invent quotations and falsify them in an article; nowhere in the cited source did Brad Bird say "Just put it out". If I see you do this again on any article, I will report you and seek a block. Grandpallama (talk) 14:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please refrain from making edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to The Big Lebowski, without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a type of change that other editors should be allowed to comment on. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:43, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Army of Darkness, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Scream (1996 film), you may be blocked from editing. You were already previously warned about adding unsourced material, and in this case the material you added directly contradicted the provided source. DonIago (talk) 15:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to use Hulu as a source for genre classification...and I don't think it's a good choice, especially relative to AllMovie...please get a consensus at the article's Talk page first. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 01:54, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at An American Werewolf in London. DonIago (talk) 15:15, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent unsourced edits and a complete lack of communication with editors regarding concerns raised about your edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Scream 2. Are you really back to adding genres without backing them up with sources so soon after having been blocked? DonIago (talk) 17:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:48, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 05:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]