User talk:Rosogolla Film

April 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:55, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rosogolla Film/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Rosogolla Film/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 12:47, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello, Rosogolla Film. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but User:Rosogolla Film/sandbox has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G11. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Users who do so may be blocked from editing. Promotional content is vigorously deleted. Wikipedia:Identifying blatant advertising#Typical signs of blatant advertising contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Dlohcierekim/promo. Sometimes pages meeting WP:CSD#G11 give the appearance of an editor violating Wikipedia:Conflict of interest or WP:PAID. Please read and heed them if they apply to you.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

YOU CAN ASK FOR HELP AT THE TEAHOUSE

Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions. Wikipedia is not a webhost. You may wish to consider alternative outlets.

If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.

You may find this tool useful: Google custom search Don't feel discouraged. My first attempts at creating articles were deleted too.

Wikipedia has many articles in need of improvement. Perhaps you can help.

Category:All articles needing copy edit

Category:Articles lacking sources

Category:Articles lacking in-text citations

There is more information at Wikipedia:Community portal Cheers, and happy editing. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:31, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unblock discussion considering connection with draft deleted as WP:CSD#G11

~~In my view, the following conditions should be set for unblocking. To be unblocked:~~

the user should propose a new username that meets the username policy

the user should confirm that this account is used by one individual only

the user should agree to avoid creating or directly editing articles related to Rosogolla (requested edits will still be permitted)

the user should agree to abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use and disclose any paid relationship in accordance with the paid contributor policy

the user should indicate what areas of Wikipedia the user intends to edit in the future
~~If the user has no interest in editing Wikipedia beyond writing about your organisation, then the user should not be unblocked. If this is the case, I recommend the user consider alternative outlets.~~

~~I'm sorry that this message could not be more favourable.~~ --Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:38, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t know if you noticed that this is a soft block and that the block message explicitly says they may just start a new account, as is standard procedure for someone with an WP:ORGNAME that has only made a few edits. So, unless you intend to alter the block settings to a hard block, they don’t need to meet any of these conditions to continue editing. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:53, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. That is a problem.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:00, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]