User talk:Ruhrob

November 2023

Your recent editing history at The Ingraham Angle shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Czello ^(music) 12:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ruhrob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocking my account was unreasonable. I didn't break any rules Ruhrob (talk) 20:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think the reasons listed in the block log are correct. 331dot (talk) 07:40, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Appeal to block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ruhrob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

in my opinion the the block has no basis and unreasonable, but still I'm open to listening to the advice of administrators and changing my behavior for the better Ruhrob (talk) 09:53, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have reviewed your block, and consider it reasonable. I am declining your unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 13:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ruhrob (talk) 09:53, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ruhrob, do not alter declined unblock requests.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:27, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is it prohibited? Ruhrob (talk) 16:30, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, as an obvious extension of WP:BLANKING.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:44, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal to block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ruhrob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ruhrob (talk) 21:13, 19 November 2023 (UTC)indefinite block is unjustifyable Ruhrob (talk) 21:13, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As access to this page has been revoked there is no further point in keeping this request opened. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Someone else will review this, but I highly advise you to rethink your strategy to get unblock as it's almost certain to fail unless you change your approach and acknowledge the reasons for the block. We don't need an apology but we do need you to address the reasons themselves. Just some free advice, take it or leave it. 331dot (talk) 21:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to 331dot

in their reply @331dot asked me to "rethink your strategy... unless you change your approach and acknowledge the reasons for the block". In my previous appeal I acknowledged my reasons and pointed out, that I'm ready to listen to administrators' advices and change my behaviour, but still haven't been unblocked, so asks to "change my approach" seems to be confusing, as there is still no guarantee, that my request will be satisfied. Ruhrob (talk) 10:46, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Impeccable logic. TPA revoked for repeated disruptive unblock requests and failure to listen to good advice from administrators regarding those requests.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:25, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]