User talk:SMcCandlish/Archive 73
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:SMcCandlish. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 70 | Archive 71 | Archive 72 | Archive 73 | Archive 74 | Archive 75 | → | Archive 80 |
December 2012
Disregard| Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited | |
|---|---|
 |
|
WP:MMA Invite
Disregard
|
Thanks for helping to make MMA articles on Wikipedia better! In November 97 people made a total of 899 edits to MMA articles. I noticed you haven't listed yourself on the WikiProject Mixed martial arts Participants page. Take a look, sign up, and don't forget to say hi on the talk page. Kevlar (talk) 20:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC) |
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force
ResolvedGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:24, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
GOCE November drive wrap-up
DisregardExtended content
| |
|---|---|
|
– Your drive coordinators: Stfg, Allens, and Torchiest. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:00, 3 December 2012
The WikiProject: Good Articles Newsletter (December 2012)
DisregardExtended content
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
-- Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 3 December 2012
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment
ResolvedGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Template:Tq
ResolvedHi, SMcCandlish, thank you for creating Template:Tq. Very convenient! Bishonen | talk 19:59, 6 December 2012 (UTC).
- You're most welcome. :-) — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 01:57, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
ResolvedGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Categories, lists, and navigation templates
ResolvedGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Categories, lists, and navigation templates. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Cite4Wiki fails in Firefox 17
Resolved
Hello. You have a new message at Wikipedia talk:Cite4Wiki's talk page. Message added 23:22, 10 December 2012 (UTC).
E8 (talk) 23:22, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
- Summary: Nothing I can do about the problem reported there, alas. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 17:04, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- I probably can't help (never worked on an add-on) but I'm willing to have a look if you can let me into the project. Jojalozzo 17:33, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
- It's not on SourceForge or anything; there's no repository. There SHOULD be one. For now, you just need to download the add-on and unzip it. :-) — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 23:58, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
- I probably can't help (never worked on an add-on) but I'm willing to have a look if you can let me into the project. Jojalozzo 17:33, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
ResolvedHi, SMcCandlish. In this edit of {{para/doc}}, you added a link to species:template:para, saying "it's for update propagation." But 1. does this link really enable propagation, by bots or something automatic? 2. It is visible in {{para}} page itself. Could you fix it? Thanks in advance. --Ahora (talk) 12:41, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 16:59, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
GOCE mid-December newsletter
DisregardExtended content
| |
|---|---|
|
– Your drive coordinators: Stfg, Allens, and Torchiest. Message delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 00:23, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/China-related articles
DisregardGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/China-related articles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-admin closure
ResolvedGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-admin closure. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:16, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (music)
ResolvedGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (music). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- Did you have any further thoughts on the changes implemented on your recommendations? Mkdwtalk 00:24, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yes; I posted them. The charts thing is still problematic for two reasons (being in top 200 is not significant like top 20 is, and depending on country size and which chart, they charts are not comparable to each other, even if both are top 100 or whatever). — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 00:40, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Greetings!
Resolved.jpg)
Gareth Griffith-Jones – The WelshBuzzard – is wishing you the season's greetings.
Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's solstice or Christmas,
Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus,
or the Saturnalia,
this is a special time of year for (almost) everyone.
- Thanks! You too! — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 00:11, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your encouragement this year. I like your signature.Cheers –
– Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard| 00:45, 24 December 2012 (UTC)- It's the Terminator. I have a subpage around here somewhere with other face ASCIIart. I try to remember to use a different one each year, so I'll let the Terminator go pretty soon. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 22:21, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. Cheers! Have a terrific day! –
– Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard| 09:20, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. Cheers! Have a terrific day! –
- It's the Terminator. I have a subpage around here somewhere with other face ASCIIart. I try to remember to use a different one each year, so I'll let the Terminator go pretty soon. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 22:21, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your encouragement this year. I like your signature.Cheers –
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
ResolvedGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
RFC/U for Apteva: move to close
ResolvedI am notifying all participants in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Apteva that Dicklyon has moved to close the RFC/U, with a summary on the talkpage. Editors may now support or oppose the motion, or add comments:
Please consider adding your signature, so that the matter can be resolved.
Best wishes,
NoeticaTea? 03:46, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done, but if it doesn't include "disruptive"/"disruption" I can't support a close motion. The entire basis of the RFC/U is WP:DE. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 01:04, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Category:Glossaries of medical terms
ResolvedCategory:Glossaries of medical terms, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 21:42, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Category talk:Hungarian communities in Vojvodina
ResolvedGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:Hungarian communities in Vojvodina. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 08:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons
ResolvedGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:15, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
Resolved
|
I love Cite4Wiki and have used it hundreds of times. I would like for it to be better developed. I am not a developer and am not sure how I could help, but the tool has been very valuable to me and I am not sure how I could replace it if it were gone. Thoughts? Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:07, 26 December 2012 (UTC) |
- I've asked WP:Signpost to run an ad, seeking FF17-experienced developers. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 20:13, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
ResolvedGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:17, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Circa
This edit explains how to write "ca.", which is still discouraged at MOS:#Abbreviations, WP:YEAR, WP:SMOS#Abbreviations, and maybe MOS:DOB, and after you must have read my complaint and ordeal at WT:Manual of Style/Abbreviations#Circa. Either allow "ca." or don't allow "ca.", I don't care which, but do it consistently. Art LaPella (talk) 15:41, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Sounds like a good WP:RFC. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 17:52, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- It's been hard to get opinions on circa in the past. Anyway, can I undo that edit, until when and if someone wants to edit the other guidelines to match? If we leave it there indefinitely, nobody will notice except me. Art LaPella (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- I don't care; this will have to be dealt with in an RfC anyway. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 20:44, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done (now I don't need to wonder if the RfC will ever be acted on :) ) Art LaPella (talk) 21:08, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- I don't care; this will have to be dealt with in an RfC anyway. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 20:44, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- It's been hard to get opinions on circa in the past. Anyway, can I undo that edit, until when and if someone wants to edit the other guidelines to match? If we leave it there indefinitely, nobody will notice except me. Art LaPella (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Cite4Wiki
Resolved Hello. You have a new message at Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions's talk page.
- Mainly, I would just like a URL for the latest version of the code (ideally in a repository). Superm401 - Talk 21:39, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Adminship
Also, on a completely separate note, have you recently thought about adminship? Mkdwtalk 00:24, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Not really. I think I'm too outspoken for a lot of people. I think it's been 2 years or so since I went to RfA. Maybe even 3, I don't really remember. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 00:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks!
ResolvedThe help on WP:COPYEDIT is much appreciated. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 21:59, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- You're welcome. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 00:28, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Oaklawn Farm Zoo
ResolvedI guess I'm more looking for advice here than anything. You undid the expandable animal list in this article. The original reasoning for this technique was to avoid having a list that completely dominates the article, which is supposed to be an article, not a list. Several other techniques have been used by various editors, including just deleting the list and creating a separate list article. Where someone has had the time, the lists have been shortened to just the "notable" animals and turned into part of the narrative (which I consider the best solution because these lists are almost never sourced and are often modified someone who says "I saw X at the zoo"). In any case, long lists are discouraged as is hidden content. If you have any more insight on the best way to handle such lists let me know. There are a lot of articles that I have handled in this manner so that they look more like articles than lists, and I don't really have the short term time to go convert all of them to narrative even if I consider that the long term ideal. Thank you. Don Lammers (talk) 15:11, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- This has been discussed many times at WT:MOS and elsewhere, and the consensus has always clearly been to not hide content from readers. There is not particular Wikipedia principle that an article cannot be dominated by a list if and when a list is the best format to use to present the information. The usual solutions to this when the domination is seen as problematic are to expand the regular prose in the article, and/or move the list into a stand-alone list if a split seems warranted, e.g. per the "summary style" guideline. The other obvious solution is the one you mention – convert the list into prose. For a case like this, that sounds like the best option. The list as a list doesn't serve much purpose, and you're right of course that people will be tempted to add "what I saw today" to it, without sources and just from memory (this probably accounts for some of the entries being bogus). At any rate, long lists are somewhat discouraged, but hiding content in articles is essentially forbidden. WP:MOS#Scrolling lists and collapsible content says this should not even be done to collapse long references sections, much less real article content, not even plot spoilers. It's permissible in infoboxes and other tables, if and when the information is already presented in the prose. It's also permitted in some weird cases like chess problems (though a case can easily be made that this violates the prohibition against collapsing spoilers). NB: I know MOS is a guideline; I use terms like "permitted" and "forbidden" as shorthand, and am well aware that WP:IAR is policy. Not being entirely satisfied with the prose-to-list ratio in an article doesn't seem to be an IAR-level concern, though. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ⊝כ⊙þ Contrib. 20:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- I generally try not to tangle with MoS (though I can hardly claim to have read the millions of words that have been dedicated to it). I originally started using hidden lists because someone was deleting lists entirely based on the arguments above, and quite frankly, it takes a lot more time to convert to prose than delete a list -- so basically trying to save information. I guess I will just have to figure a way to deal with it. Don Lammers (talk) 20:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- Try an external text editor with good search/replace functionality. It took me under 3 min. to fix Detroit Zoo#Animals, including de-capitalization of common names. That said, a strong argument can actually be made for simply deleting these animals-in-the-zoo lists, since they will almost never be complete except for the tiniest small-town municipal zoo (e.g. that in Clovis, New Mexico, which you can see in its entirety in under one hour), prone to bogus additions, perpetually outdated, and of questionable encyclopedic use. A list of rare animals would probably be useful (e.g. it was very notable at the time that the San Francisco California Academy of Science natural history museum and aquarium had one of the only (if not the only) endangered Chinese giant salamanders outside of Asia, until it died ca. 2002 – it was the only chance for many people to ever see one. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ⊝כ⊙þ Contrib. 21:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- You may also be interested in WT:Manual of Style#Clarification to "Scrolling lists and collapsible content". — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ⊝כ⊙þ Contrib. 21:58, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- My own preference is to not include such lists at all (for all the reasons you mention above), but to include descriptive text about the exhibits which (almost always) includes at least the more important animals without getting into a big unmanageable list. I have not always been successful in arguing this with fans of individual zoos who can recite the current animal list from memory. I thought making the list expandable would satisfy both sides of the argument (the fans could create their list, but it wouldn't be "in your face"), but since this is highly frowned upon, I will stop doing it. Don Lammers (talk) 23:23, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- I have the same preference, but don't want to get into arguments right now on zoo article talk pages. Heh. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ⊝כ⊙þ Contrib. 01:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- Try an external text editor with good search/replace functionality. It took me under 3 min. to fix Detroit Zoo#Animals, including de-capitalization of common names. That said, a strong argument can actually be made for simply deleting these animals-in-the-zoo lists, since they will almost never be complete except for the tiniest small-town municipal zoo (e.g. that in Clovis, New Mexico, which you can see in its entirety in under one hour), prone to bogus additions, perpetually outdated, and of questionable encyclopedic use. A list of rare animals would probably be useful (e.g. it was very notable at the time that the San Francisco California Academy of Science natural history museum and aquarium had one of the only (if not the only) endangered Chinese giant salamanders outside of Asia, until it died ca. 2002 – it was the only chance for many people to ever see one. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ⊝כ⊙þ Contrib. 21:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- I generally try not to tangle with MoS (though I can hardly claim to have read the millions of words that have been dedicated to it). I originally started using hidden lists because someone was deleting lists entirely based on the arguments above, and quite frankly, it takes a lot more time to convert to prose than delete a list -- so basically trying to save information. I guess I will just have to figure a way to deal with it. Don Lammers (talk) 20:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga
ResolvedGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Resolved Hello. You have a new message at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style's talk page. Message added 23:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC).
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style's talk page. Message added 00:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC).
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I watch that page, and don't need talkbacks about it. :-) — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ⊝כ⊙þ Contrib. 02:11, 31 December 2012 (UTC)