User talk:Samvel Khuspov

Extended-confirmed required[edit]

It has come to my attention that you have recently started to edit in articles related to Armenia and Azerbaijan, this editing area is under a community imposed extended-confirmed restriction. Your number of edits is below the threshold for editing in the area, thus you cannot currently edit in articles and content related to Armenia or Azerbaijan, please refrain from doing so, any edits you have done since this restriction was implemented should be reverted, I will take the liberty of reverting wherever it's appropriate. NMW03 (talk) 17:11, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you care if I make any article changes on Armenian-Azerbaijani conflicts? Samvel Khuspov (talk) 07:54, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, why did you delete my article about Tigranes the Great. How would you feel if I deleted articles about Qara Qoyunlu, or Aq Qoyunlu. No one has given you the right to delete any valuable historical content. Humble yourself now. Samvel Khuspov (talk) 10:47, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please note that as stated above, editors with fewer than 500 edits and 30 days on their accounts are not allowed to edit any content related to Armenia or Azerbaijan, broadly construed (WP:GS/AA). Further violations of this community-authorized sanction will result in blocks against your account. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 12:54, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Aq Qoyunlu, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Blanking the lead of an article is not the way to correct factual inaccuracies. If you have changes you would like reflected in the article, find some reliable sources (WP:RS) and update (add to) the article. Alternatively, start a discussion on the talk page of the article. Thanks! penguinencounter2@enwiki:~/talk/contrib$ 02:36, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I promise to not remove content from Aq Qoyunlu as long as Azerbaijanis do not remove Armenian content Samvel Khuspov (talk) 02:49, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to take that attitude you are likely to be blocked from editing. Making disruptive changes in retaliation for other editors making changes is not acceptable, nor is any kind of editing based on a nationalist perspective. JBW (talk) 11:44, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is simply not fair, you can’t just block me just for being slightly offended at me, I can’t just do nothing while Azeris delete my articles for no reason. Samvel Khuspov (talk) 17:15, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for WP:BATTLEGROUND behavior and repeated violations of WP:GS/AA, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]