User talk:SandyGeorgia/ArbVotes2011

Kww

Voters who care for more information on the Natalee Holloway article and both the nominee and Sandy's role in it may care to peruse this and surrounding threads. Also see [1]. I will leave it to the fairmindedness of the voters to decide if Kww did anything wrong. And the community votes on running the article were 6-0 and when it was renominated 6-0. Nuff said.--Wehwalt (talk) 15:00, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know?

"... that high autumn pork prices are blamed on Americans eating so many BLTs (pictured) during the summer?"

Speaking of Wikipedia's main page, you might wish to look at BLT and my discussion, with a BLT (pictured).

Cheers, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 22:25, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Correction on percentage

You have an incorrect statement that the threshold for election has changed. It has not. If it had been any higher (say 60%), three spots would not have been filled in 2010

John Vandenberg 295 339 216 79 57.73% Jclemens 279 358 213 66 56.71% Shell Kinney 292 335 223 69 56.70%

As well as Shell again in 2009 (just below 60%.. microscopically so but actually below). Just correcting this. SirFozzie (talk) 08:41, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I'm unsure how to correct it, since it is true that we never dipped to 50% before-- I'll have a look at the text, help appreciated-- idea is, 50% is a new low. Better? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:31, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]