User talk:Santosha86

Nomination of Chango (EDM) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chango (EDM) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chango (EDM) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:50, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miguel Elizalde moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Miguel Elizalde, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. In addition, there is a question of WP:COI or WP:UPE.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Do not move the page into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:03, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Onel. Thanks a lot for your message. Im mostly worked in Spanish, so I have a doubt. The article of Miguel Elizalde have been in Wikipedia ES for a long time, and wanted to translated automatically but its said that the translator its no longer for all users. So I translated manually. I know I have a little gramatical wrong but I want to know if a propertly correct the issues that you wrote about can I submit for review. Tnx for your time. Santosha86 (talk) 05:35, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you haven't commented on the possible COI/UPE question. I will post a COI query below, which provides information and helps you deal with the issue. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Santosha86. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miguel Elizalde (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notability requires significant coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources. Passing mentions, appointment announcements, press release regurgitations, and content authored by the subject themselves do not establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miguel Elizalde and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Miguel Elizalde, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:32, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Santosha86! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:32, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Miguel Elizalde

Hello, Santosha86. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Miguel Elizalde, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]