Jump to content

User talk:Sassamiss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sassamiss, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Sassamiss! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inutil (November 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sassa Gurl moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Sassa Gurl, is not suitable as written to remain published. A conflict of interest declaration is required. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:48, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sassa Gurl (November 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 19:01, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Information icon

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Sassamiss, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sassamiss|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 19:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

[edit]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 19:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madam Inutz (November 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 20:11, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sassa Gurl moved to draftspace

[edit]

When a draft is declined, it should not simply be moved into article space. An editor who is paid to edit about a topic should not make any edits to articles about that topic; when you believe that the draft is ready to become an article you should submit it for review, not move it yourself. bonadea contributions talk 09:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 09:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sassa Gurl (November 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 23:55, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 18:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sassa Gurl for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sassa Gurl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sassa Gurl (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

bonadea contributions talk 20:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Johnclarencevelasco per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnclarencevelasco. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 18:03, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]