User talk:Saurang Vara

Welcome!

Hello, Saurang Vara!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mayur chauhan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mayur chauhan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and you need to highlight the movies where the subject has had significant roles. Non-notable films/series do not help.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:21, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mayur chauhan (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is no proof whatsoever of notability (or of "famous"), and the article needs copyediting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mayur chauhan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 12:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saurang Vara! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Drmies (talk) 12:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mayur chauhan (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mayur chauhan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Mayur chauhan, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Saurang Vara, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Saurang Vara|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jeraxmoira,I want to clarify that I am not a paid employee or compensated in any way for my edits on Wikipedia. I am contributing to the content out of personal interest and to help improve the accuracy and quality of the information available. I am not affiliated with any organization or client regarding these edits. Saurang Vara (talk) 10:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mayur chauhan, you may be blocked from editing. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.thestorybehindname.com/mayur-chauhan-aka-michael-becoming-successful-with-confidence/

Can you please confirm this source for mayur Chauhan?@Jeraxmoira Saurang Vara (talk) 12:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source is unreliable. Are you Akshay Upadhyay, the author of that article? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I'm not Akshay Upadhyay,but I watched an interview of Mayur Chauhan on YouTube where he talked about his life and education. After searching online, I found an article with the same information.No. Saurang Vara (talk) 14:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't add it again without a reliable and published third-party source. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:38, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]