User talk:Savethealfhousearticle

This band is quite notable. Please do some research and follow the sources before you jump to conclusions.

Speedy deletion of S.T.R.E.E.T.S.

A tag has been placed on S.T.R.E.E.T.S. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Merenta 03:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of S.T.R.E.E.T.S.

A tag has been placed on S.T.R.E.E.T.S., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Merenta 04:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked. Please don't recreate articles that have been deleted. They were deleted for a reason, and that reason still applies when it's been reposted. Cheerio and happy editing! Merenta 04:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am disputing the deletion of this article

I wasn't even finished editing it before you deleted it! Check the damn sources already. This is a valid article.

The article's already gone - there's nothing to dispute any more. I didn't delete it, but an administrator did. When you save an article, you have in fact finished editing it and submitted it to the community, including administrators. Your article was deleted for the reasons listed above. If you want to more fully develop an article, that's fine - but do so in a subpage of your user space or in the sandbox. The main article space isn't the proper place for it. When you have finished the article, then submit it to the main article space. The links on this very page will lead you through this process. Cheerio, and happy editing! Merenta 04:45, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]