User talk:Sceptile

Team Rocket (anime)

If this is in relation to Team Rocket (anime), editors reached a consensus to not include that information. If you want to notify users that you wrote a message, sign it with 4 tildes (~~~~). Cheers, H ig hway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 19:43, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The editors that monitor these article have decided against adding information like which you added to article. If you want to find out about writing style, see the Manual of Style. H ig hway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 20:40, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you refer to the game, Star Fox, or the character Fox McCloud? H ig hway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 20:43, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not how I expected...

Hello Sceptile, its Evilgidgit here if you know who I mean. I never expected you to act like that in your post in the nice guy's talk page. Good luck editing this website, my friend. Also, to sign your comments simply do four of these ~. Have fun. Evilgidgit 14:43, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weird?

Hello Sceptile. I got home and my account is working just fine and it is not banned! How's yours? I think only the IP addresses we had before we joined have been banned, but don't ask me why. Evilgidgit 14:25, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Sonic X

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Sonic X. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Gdo01 21:13, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of what your feelings for the character are please try to add a less insulting description of the character.--Gdo01 21:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Your Edit to Megatron (Beast Wars and Beast Machines)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ThePointblank 09:25, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Digimon Last Words

So what if the last words are not needed, its not inappropiate is it? It's not abuseing the site is it? It's not violating the site is it? No ofcouse not so stop deleting the text like I told many other jerks who do for no reason. If you got a complante tell me.

Listen to me and listen well. If you disagree then I suggest you tell me with a more civil kind of tone. I will not tolerate uncivil users. And if other "jerk users" have removed that info because it is not needed, then those users can agree with me that it is not needed. So, I have the right to remove it, just as you do the right to add it. And besides, I only deleted it once. Ah, and here are some things you should read. Believe me, you are in dire need to read and understand these.

Thank you very little. --Tohru Honda13^{Sign here!} 20:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack warning.

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
I've seen your edit summaries, and calling Ned Scott other disgusting names are in violation of Personal Attacks. Thank you. --Tohru Honda13^{Talk•Sign here} 08:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last Comments.

Hello there Sceptile. Concerning your additions to Last words, please see the outcome of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Digimon Systems Update#Last Words. You might find something interesting. Your last words have gotten out of control, even going so far as attacking users who revert the last words. Cease and desist. Thank you, --Tohru Honda13^{Talk•Sign here} 08:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia works by creating consensus. While consensus can change, it is not the case here, and disregarding consensus altogether is not very civil. Please stop, or at least discuss your argument before unilaterally adding these informations.Circeus 20:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's clear you've been aware of our policies and guidelines for a long time and have been willfully ignoring them all along, despite numerous calls not to do so. That earns you an indefinite block. Have a nice day.Circeus 20:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock ME

It embarissing that i'm apologising but I will so I can continue updating profiles and no before you say anything I will not include Last Words ever again unless you give me permission (Like that will ever happen) I've waited for over a mounth and I belive thats longer than what people userly get when they're blocked of so please let me free from the chains. PS Send me a repliy as soon as possible.

Okay, I'll give you another chance. If you're still interested in editing Digimon articles, you might want to ask around at WP:DIGI how best you can help.Circeus 19:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Final Fantasy III (Nintendo DS). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Thank you. Kariteh 19:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Leomon

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Leomon. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leomon. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]