This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
But then when I wanted to move the discussion, Sulla16 ordered (!) me not to touch it. The point of wiki is that it's freely editable and that no one owns articles. (Except Sulla16 it seems.)
Of course an edit war ensued. Sulla16 kept reverting and putting in the comments that he was looking for mediation. He was not looking very hard. In fact if you check his contribution log he went eight days between 28 February and 9 March 2007 without looking for mediation but saying he was. In the end, I'm the one who went through the chore of starting the mediation process.
I then took a few days off, to show good faith. After a little while, I again took the POV text out but still in order to show good faith, I put 90% of it back in a different place where POV was OK (the legacy section). And still Sulla16 reverts. Given how closed to compromise he's been, I find his comment "lets let mediation take its course" kind of presumptious.
On an aside, Sulla16 has been rather insulting to me and while I accepted his apology, I think he worded it in a weaselly way.
So, since he won't compromise, I reverted as well and this is where things stand at this point. I am now thinking of starting arbitration proceedings against Sulla16 for refusal to look for consensus and with the object of banning him from Wikipedia for a few days and banning him from the Sulla page for a few months. Cheers, Vincent01:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
hello. i noticed you are listed as a moderator for vandalproof. i was recently approved, however, each time i try to 'verify' my username, the software informs me that i am not on the user list. i was wondering if you could help. tx. the_undertowtalk00:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
tx for the reply. i was approved for the latest version (last batch of approvals). its the only version i have tried to use. i was approved by betacommand, but havent been able to reach him. the_undertowtalk23:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC)my approval[reply]
Yo. Just thought I should say that I DO add things that need adding. This redirect, for starters: ML_inequality. You wouldn't believe how long I'd spent trying to find it on wikipedia.
When I find one that need writing, I will (and have done). I'd argue that that cross-link is of more value to those few of us who need to look it up, than writing a similar stuby article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kvetch (talk • contribs) 21:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Hello, Xyrael. As a prominent contributor to sulla, you may want to be aware that a request for comments has been filed about it. The RFC can be found by the article's name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found on Talk:sulla, in case you wish to participate. Thank you for your contributions. -- Nick15:17, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Xyrael, I noticed you are also on this vandal's tail. I am a bit worried this anon IP actually functions as a sockpuppet. I also have a rough idea of which account's sock it might be, but I'd hate to wrongly accuse. I was wondering if you have the same idea? FelisLeoTalk!09:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Xyrael, if you think it's unlikely that by allowing account creation, it will not be used to create vandal accounts, I'll trust your judgement on that and I'd be fine with allowing it.--Alfmelmac10:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm all for what appears to be the most sensible solution - the most recent block wins as it were - yours should override mine (crosses his fingers he's remembered correctly) --Alfmelmac10:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
User:Monikaaristovski vandalising "The Real World"
Xyr, look at waht this guy's just done:
(cur) (last) 07:31, 24 March 2007 63.228.160.152 (Talk) (→Badges of the ranks)
(cur) (last) 07:31, 24 March 2007 63.228.160.152 (Talk) (→Divisions)
(cur) (last) 07:30, 24 March 2007 63.228.160.152 (Talk) (→History)
all of which are blanking the section and replacing it with "I like pie"
--SplingyRanger07:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Achondroplasia
Xyr, NJmostwanted has just done alll of this in front of my own eyes!!:
(cur) (last) 14:40, 24 March 2007 NJmostwanted (Talk | contribs) (Infromation is corrupt.)
(cur) (last) 14:39, 24 March 2007 NJmostwanted (Talk | contribs) (Infromation is corrupt.)
(cur) (last) 14:39, 24 March 2007 NJmostwanted (Talk | contribs) (Infromation is corrupt.)
(cur) (last) 14:39, 24 March 2007 NJmostwanted (Talk | contribs) (Infromation is corrupt.)
(cur) (last) 14:38, 24 March 2007 NJmostwanted (Talk | contribs) (Infromation is corrupt.)
(cur) (last) 14:38, 24 March 2007 SplingyRanger (Talk | contribs) (Revert to revision 117525556 dated 2007-03-24 14:37:25 by NJmostwanted using popups)
(cur) (last) 14:38, 24 March 2007 NJmostwanted (Talk | contribs) (Infromation is corrupt.)
(cur) (last) 14:37, 24 March 2007 NJmostwanted (Talk | contribs)
(cur) (last) 14:37, 24 March 2007 NJmostwanted (Talk | contribs) (→Incidence/Prevalence)
I would like to thank you for your support in my recent RFA. As you may or may not be aware, it passed with approximately 99% support. I ensure you that I will use the tools well, and if I ever disappoint you, I am open to recall. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to leave me a note on my talkpage. Thanks again, ^demon[omg plz]20:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a rather unpleasant username, especially as there is a user called Walfuz. He has also regularly vandalised his talkpage, replacing it with words to the effect of "Walfuz is gay". This is rather unacceptable, so I think it may need an indefinite block.—SplingyRanger14:44, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, what happened with our mediation? Thoric and I returned your e-mail, but you haven't followed up. Is there something wrong? Jolb13:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you have removed my name from the VandalProof Registration page. I would like to ask why, as I clearly fufill all of the criteria for VP, and have not received any reason why I have been denied twice now. Thanks!! Kntrabssi16:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have also been removed from the main list twice whilst meeting criteria and have not received a reason either. Combating vandalism manually (though I do use scripts where I can) is too slow for me & I look forward to trying out VP. If there are any reasons why my approval is denied please leave me a message. Thanks -- Zarius11:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315
Hey Xyrael Sean :-); I took the liberty of updating your talk page header - the "leave a new message" link was still pointing to User talk:Xyrael, and so using that link messages weren't reaching here ... hope you don't mind! anthony[cfc]13:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Sean Whitton! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, as well as the mod list, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, such as yourself. The only change not made is your account of the SMF forums has not been renamed, since I do not have the power to do that. Prodegotalk21:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey buddy, don't mean to be rude or anything, but memoserv on IRC doesn't work in IceChat. I thought I disabled it, but apparently it says you left a message with it, and I have no idea what it is. It looks like it was from a week or so ago, so I'm assuming it's been resolved by now. It's best if you contact me via my talk page, or E-mail if it's a private matter. Thanks! —Pilotguycleared for takeoff20:47, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
