User talk:Secisalive!

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names (2nd nomination), are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. ----Cometstyles 18:30, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Notice

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attacking another editor and being a suspected sock of User:France a. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

pardon???

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Secisalive! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

how many warnings did my brother get??? i'm his brother not a mimmicker! if you are unsure see User:France a and COUNT! --Secisalive! 18:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Confirmed abusive sockpuppet. — Yamla 18:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, you may be his brother, but this edit suggests otherwise. France a had a great many warnings, and you knew that calling someone a stupid Jew - by replacing a page - and placing a deletion notice on a userpage was wrong.--Rambutan (talk) 18:42, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

An update: you had six warnings under the guise of France a, and four is considered an acceptable number after which you can be blocked. You had two extra warnings.--Rambutan (talk) 18:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

ahem! not me, my brother!--Secisalive! 12:24, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

my brother might be evil, i am certainly unable to be held under a false accusation! --Secisalive! 14:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Aside from the fact that it is impossible for us to tell if you are your brother or not, it doesn't matter, as you were blocked on your own merits. If you do have a brother, then it is obvious that you understand the rules well enough to know not to insult users (meaning that it was unnecessary to warn you multiple times before blocking you indefinitely). If you don't have a brother, then you're the same person and you're abusing multiple account. Either way, the block stands. EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:01, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

my bruv forced me as soon as i set this account up to get his own back on rambutan for using unfair language on him --Secisalive! 09:46, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

I did not use unfair language. Your brother can't force you to do anything. This edit suggests that you are the same person. Would you care to respond to that edit?--Rambutan (talk) 12:18, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

have you seen my brother??? i have noticed that a certain 'majorly' has requested my brothers unblcking, and as he now cant edit his own talk page, would like him to be able to talk to him --Secisalive! 07:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

No, majorly hasn't requested unblocking. If s/he has, provide a link. Can't you telephone your brother?--Rambutan (talk) 09:42, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

its on your talk page rambutan! also, what has andonic done when he says no problem??? --Secisalive! 12:06, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

My talkpage says the following: "Majorly said the block on France was fair". That means s/he approved. I had thanked AndroniO for protecting your France a talkpage, to stop you/him editing it.--Rambutan (talk) 13:45, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

so he's biased! i calll that un fair, even if my brother did force me to vandalise on his behalf! --Secisalive! 16:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Point of interest: if your brother did force you to do something (which I don't believe, but that's primarily because I wasn't born yesterday), then that's all the more reason to not unblock your account; he could easily "force" you to vandalize again. Your block shall remain in place. EVula // talk // ☯ // 14:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

and another thing, i even only got given 7 MINUTES to stop vandalising!--Secisalive! 16:12, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Until you explain this edit, I refuse to believe that you are not France a. Majorly is not biased, and you were the one who brought them into this, by bluffing - rather pathetically - that s/he disapproved of your block. You knew that calling people "stupid Jews" was wrong, and you knew that adding deletion notices to userpages was wrong, therefore you did not need the numerous warnings given to you under this account. You will not be unblocked.--Rambutan (talk) 16:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

so what are you holding against me if i am ( which i am not) france a (my brother) --Secisalive! 16:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

You were blocked for violating three Wikipedia policies...

• • The sockpuppet policy - until you explain "that edit", we will have to assume that you are your brother. Also, if your brother can force you to do things, this is essentially his account. You may think that I am holding it against you that you've got multiple accounts - policy requires that you don't.
  • The vandalism policy - you placed that deletion notice on my userpage.
  • No personal attacks - you abused an editor by calling them a "stupid Jew".

This is not to mention that you bluffed about administrators wanting you unblocked.--Rambutan (talk) 16:24, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

your talk page history shows that a certain majorly did no editing to your talk page, also i tracked the ip to be the same as yours! (and if you blame it on YOUR brother, i won't believe you!) --Secisalive! 16:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

That's true - Majorly didn't edit my talkpage. AndronicO told me Majorly's opinion, and I don't know if that's correct or not. However, since you've started lying about having the very privileged checkuser permission which would enable you to examine IP addresses, I'm going to request protection on this page, which will stop you from editing it.--Rambutan (talk) 16:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

in my school we used to have a term for that, i think it is 'sore loser' and considering you are a administrator, can't you protect this page anyway??? --Secisalive! 16:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

(edit conflict) I'm not an administrator and I never said I was. I'm not being a sore loser since I haven't lost. Neither you nor I can track IP addresses in the way you described, and I've explained the policies you breached. This is probably your last chance to respond to my list of violations before this page is protected, so I'd use it wisely.--Rambutan (talk) 16:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

cant majorly have put it on the talk page himself, oh and why didnt me and my brother get any welcoming or recieve any guidelines on how to edit wikipedia like some people i've seen???--Secisalive! 16:45, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Majorly is a side-issue, and I don't wish to focus on it. I'm not sure if AndonicO's comment about them was true or not, but that doesn't affect the fact that you have violated three policies, as listed above. I'm sorry you didn't get a welcome, but you didn't really need one to know that vandalism was wrong.--Rambutan (talk) 16:48, 15 May 2007 (UTC)