User talk:Sergomen1

FYI conflict of interest guideline

see also: Wikipedia is not a soapbox and What may I not have on my user page?

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia in User:Sergomen1/Virtonomics, Virtonomics, or other articles, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Athaenara ✉ 20:37, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've noted the "hangon" tag you applied to the above-captioned article and the statements/questions you left on its associated talk page. Although as a general rule comparisons of utility between individual articles are not felt to be useful (see WP:WAX for details), I can answer your question specifically with respect to the article you mentioned; it had nine reliable sources demonstrating notability and yours had none. Please, as noted above, refer to our frequently asked questions for organizations. I'll try to simplify this response so it will be immediately helpful, but by leaving out a lot of useful detail -- essentially, Wikipedia articles are not about things that might be notable in the future, Wikipedia articles are about things that presently are notable and demonstrate that notability with reference to reliable sources of expert opinion in a verifiable way. I don't see anything in the article that makes me think that the topic is currently notable and thus I have decided to agree with the individual who tagged it for speedy deletion. If you feel you can provide a number of reliable sources demonstrating notability (which same were not apparent to me on a brief Google search), feel free to leave me a note and I'll provide you with a copy of the deleted material in a "sandbox" page so that you can add those sources before restoring the article. I urge you to follow the links in this paragraph for more complete background information that will answer your questions, as well as by reading WP:Why was my article deleted?. If you have further questions after mastering that material, feel free to leave me a note. Accounting4Taste:talk 21:36, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Virtonomics

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Virtonomics meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtonomics. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last seven days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Accounting4Taste:talk 18:42, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:09, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note on my talk page. I have made a copy of the note you left and placed it on the discussion page found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtonomics, which is the correct place for discussions about the future of this article. If you have any further comments or links, it would be a good idea to put them there. If you have any questions about the process, you can look at WP:AfD or leave me a note and I'll try to help you if I can. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Virtonomics

Thank you for the info. The best way to avoid getting the article deleted is to add several good sources, such as articles in reputable newspapers. Sources in Russian are fine, there are people here who can read it. --Apoc2400 (talk) 20:49, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Sergomen1/Virtonomics1

User:Sergomen1/Virtonomics1, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sergomen1/Virtonomics1 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Sergomen1/Virtonomics1 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 10:06, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sergomen1, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Woodroar (talk) 02:06, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

Your other account (SergomenSim) has been blocked. Wikipedia does not allow using multiple undeclared accounts (see: WP:SOCK). Take this as a final warning. If you use multiple undeclared accounts again, you may be banned from Wikipedia completely. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Virtonomics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Virtonomics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtonomics (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Soetermans. T / C 18:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]